Examining teachers’ opinions on social Justice leadership

Sosyal adalet liderliğine ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v16i4.5871

Keywords:

Social justice leadership, support, inclusion, critical consciousness, Sosyal adalet liderliği, destek, kaynaştırma, eleştirel bilinç

Abstract

Social justice leadership is a leadership approach that focuses on utilizing educational opportunities of disadvantaged students equally with others. The purpose of this research is to examine school principals' social justice leadership behaviors according to teacher's views. It was designed in terms of qualitative research method. The data were collected through focus group interviews with six teachers and individual interviews with 16 teachers. Semi-structured interview form was used for interviews. The data were analyzed by descriptive analysis. The themes were built on the dimensions of social justice leadership: supporting disadvantaged students, inclusion and critical consciousness. Based on the findings, it is concluded that the school principals concentrate more on the dimension of supporting disadvantaged students and the behaviors displayed in the other two dimensions are limited.

​Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file.

Özet

Sosyal adalet liderliği,  dezavantajlı öğrencilerin eğitim olanaklarından diğerleri ile eşit düzeyde yararlanmalarına odaklanan bir liderlik yaklaşımıdır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, okul müdürlerinin sosyal adalet liderliği davranışlarını öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelemektir. Çalışma nitel araştırma yöntemine göre desenlenmiştir. Veriler altı öğretmenle gerçekleştirilmiş olan odak grup görüşmesi ve 16 öğretmenle yapılmış olan birebir görüşmelerle toplanmıştır. Görüşmelerde yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Veriler betimsel analiz ile çözümlenmiştir. Temalar sosyal adalet liderliğinin, dezavantajlı öğrencilerin desteklenmesi, kapsama/kaynaştırma ve eleştirel bilinç boyutları çerçevesinde oluşturulmuştur. Bulgular ışığında okul müdürlerinin, dezavantajlı öğrencilerin desteklenmesi boyutuna görece daha fazla yoğunlaştıkları, diğer iki boyutta sergilenen davranışların sınırlı olduğu genel sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Seval Koçak, Uşak University

Asst. Prof., Uşak University, Faculty of Educaiton, Department of Educational Administration

Murat Özdemir, Hacettepe University

Prof. Dr., Hacettepe University, Faculty of Educaiton, Department of Educational Administration

References

Alsbury, T. L., & Shaw. N. L. (2005). Policy implications for social justice in school district consolidation. Leadershipand Policy in Schools, 4, 105–126.

Arar, K., Beycioğlu, K., & Oplatka, I. (2017). A Cross-cultural analysis of educational leadership for social justice in Israel and Turkey: Meanings actions and contexts. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(2), 192-196.

Archer, L., Hutchings, M., Leathwood, C., & Ross, A. (2003). Widening participation in higher education implications for policy and practice, In Louise Archer, Merryn Hutchings, and Alistair Ross (Eds.), Higher education and social class (pp. 193-220). London: RoutletgeFarmer.

Aronowitz, S., & Grioux, H. A. (1991). Postmodern education. politics, culture, and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Pres.

Banks, J. A.,Cookson, P., Gay, G., Hawley, W. D., Irvine, J. J., Nieto, S., Schofield, J. W., & Stephan, W. G. (2001). Diversity within unity: Essential principles for teaching and learning in a multicultural society. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(3),196-203.

Bates, R. (2005). Educational administration and social justice. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(2), 141-156.

Bayrakdar, İ. ve Karataş, İ. H. (2016). Eğitime ilişkin sosyal politikalar konusunda okul müdürlerinin görüşleri: Göynük ilçesi örneği. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 71-88.

Blackmore, J. (2002). Leadership for socially just schooling: More substance and less style in high-risk, low-trust times? Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 198-211.

Blackmore, J. (2009). International response essay leadership for social justice: A transnational dialogue. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4(1), 1-10.

Bogotch, I. E. (2000). Educational leadership and social justice: Theory into practice.. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 138-156.

Bogotch, I. E. (2002). Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 138-156.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron J.C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.

Boyles, D., Carusi, T., & Attick, D. (2009). Historical and critical interpretations of social justice. In William Ayers, Therese Quinn, and David Stoval (Eds.), Handbook of social justice in education (pp.30-43). Newyork: Routledge.

Brooks, J. S., & Miles, M. T. (2006). From scientific management to social justice... and back again? Pedagogical shifts in educational leadership. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning. file:///C:/Users/ACER/Downloads/Chapter%201%20-%20Brooks%20&%20Miles%20(1).pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 20.06.2017)

Chiu, M. M., & Walker, A. (2007). Leadership for social justice in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(6), 724-739.

Çokluk, Ö., Yılmaz, K., & Oğuz, E. (2011). Nitel bir görüşme yöntemi: odak grup görüşmesi. Kuramsal Eğitim Bilim, 4(1), 95-107.

Connor, D. J. (2014). Social justice in education for students with disabilities, In Lani Florian (Ed.), The sage handbook of special education (s.111-128). Sage Publications Ltd.

DeMatthews, D. (2014). Dimensions of social justice leadership: A critical review of actions, challenges, dilemmas, and opportunities for the inclusion of students with disabilities in U.S. schools. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 3(2), 107-122.

DeMatthews, D., & Mawhinney, H. (2014). Social justice leadership and inclusion: Exploring challenges in an urban district struggling to adres inequalities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(5), 844-881.

EFA. (2010). EFA Global monitoring report: Reaching the marginalized.

Enslin, P. (2006). Democracy, social justice and education: feminist strategies in a globalising world. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(1), 57–67.

Fischman, G. E., & P. McLaren (2005). Rethinking critical pedagogy and the gramscian and freirean legacies: From organic to committed ıntellectuals or critical pedagogy. Commitment, and praxis. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 5(4), 425-447.

Fine, M. (1989). Silence and nurturing voice in an improbable context: Urban adolescents in public schools, In H.A. Giroux and P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle (152-173). New York: State University of New York Press.

Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

Fraser N. (2001). Social justice in the knowledge society: Redistribution, recognition and participation. http://wissensgesellschaft.org/themen/orientierung/socialjustice.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 20.06.2017).

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30 th edition). New York: Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.

Furman, G. C., & Gruenewald, D. A. (2004). Expanding the landscape of social justice: A critical ecological analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 47-76.

Furman, G. C., & Shields, C. M. (2005). How can educational leaders promote and support social justice and democratic community in schools?, In W. A. Fire-stone and C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 119–137). New York: Teachers College Press

Gezer, M. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde sosyal adalet eğitimine kuramsal bir bakış. S. Dinçer (Ed), Değişen dünyada eğitim içinde (ss. 309-322). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Giroux, H. (2008). Eleştirel pedagojinin vaadi. (Çev: Deniz Tuna) İstanbul: Kalkedon Yay.

Habermas J. (2004). “Öteki” olmak “öteki”yle yaşamak. Siyaset kuramı yazıları (3.Baskı). (Çev. İ. Aka) İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.

Jordan, B. (1998). The new politics of welfare. London: Sage Pub.

Karacan, H., Bağlıbel, M., & Bindak, R. (2015). Okullarda sosyal adalet ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(31), 54-68.

Karagiannis, A., Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1996). Rationale for inclusive schooling, In Stainback, S. and W. Stainback (Eds.), Inclusion: A guide for educators (pp. 3–16). Baltimore: Paul Brooks.

Katzman, L. (2007). High-stakes testing, In A. Bursztyn (Ed.), The Praeger handbook of special education (pp. 127-129). Westport, CN: Praeger.

Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Critical pedagogy. New York: Primer, Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

Koçak, S., & Bostancı, A. (2019). Sınıf yönetiminde sosyal adalet. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 52(3), 915-942.

Kondakçı, Y., Kurtay, M. Z., Oldaç, Y. İ., & Şenay, H. H. (2016). Türkiye’de okul müdürlerinin sosyal adalet rolleri. K. Beycioğlu, N. Özer, D. Koşar ve İ. Şahin (Ed.), Eğitim yönetimi araştırmaları içinde (s. 353-361). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Mavrikos-Adamou, T. (2003). Multicultural education and democratic enhancement. Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. August 28-31, Philadelphia.

McKenzie, K. B., Christman, D. E., Hernandez, F., Fierro, E., Capper, C. A., Dantley, M., Gonzalez, M. L., McCabe, N. C. & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders for social justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 111-138.

McWhirter, E. H. (1997). Perceived barriers to education and career: Ethnic and gender differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 124-140.

Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. London: United Kingdom: Sage Publications Ltd.

Oplatka, I. (2010). The place of “social justice” in the field of educational administration: A journal based historical overview of emergent area of study, In Ira Bogotch and Carolyn, M. Shields (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Social (In) Justice. Vol 1 (pp. 15-36). London: Springer.

Özdemir, M., & Kütküt, B. (2015). Sosyal Adalet Liderliği Ölçeğ’nin (SALÖ) geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 16(3), 201-218.

Polat, F. (2011). Inclusion in education: A step towards social justice. International Journal of Educaitonal Development, 31, 50-58.

Polat, S. (2015). Eğitim politikalarının sosyal adalet aşısından sonuçları konusunda yönetici ve öğretmen görüşleri. Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, 13(49), 61-83.

Reyes, P., & Wagstaff, L. (2005). How does leadership promote successful teaching and learning for diverse students?, In W. A. Firestone and C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp.101-118). New York: Teachers College Press.

Scanlan, M. (2007). School leadership for social justice: a critique of starratt's tripartite model. Values and Ethics in Educational Administration, 5(3), 1–8.

Shields, C. M. (2004). Dialogic leadership for social justice: Overcoming pathologies of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 109-132.

Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221-258.

Theoharis, G. (2008). Woven in deeply: Identity and leadership of urban social justice principals. Education and Urban Society, 41(1), 3-25.

Tomul, E. (2009). İlköğretim okullarındaki sosyal adalet uygulamalarına ilişkin yönetici görüşleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(152), 126-137.

Turhan, M. (2010a). Social justice leadership: implications for roles and responsibilities of school administrators. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9, 1357–1361.

Turhan, M. (2010b). Social justice leadership perceptions of teacher candidates. Educational Research and Review, 5(11), 668-673.

Türnüklü, A. (2000). Eğitimbilim araştırmalarında etkin olarak kullanılabilecek nitel bir araştırma tekniği: görüşme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 24, 543-559.

Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Milli Eğitim Şura Kararları (2014). http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2014_10/02113631_17_sura.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 20.06.2017).

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

How to Cite

Koçak, S., & Özdemir, M. (2019). Examining teachers’ opinions on social Justice leadership: Sosyal adalet liderliğine ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 16(4), 1164–1179. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v16i4.5871

Issue

Section

Educational Administration and Management