Success purpose tendencies of high school students<p>Lise öğrencilerinin başarı amaç yönelimleri
Keywords:
Success, success purpose tendency, high school students, approach, avoidance, performance, Başarı, başarı amaç yönelimi, lise öğrencileri, yaklaşma, kaçınma, performansAbstract
The aim of this research is to investigate success purpose tendencies of high school students related to the high school type variable. The data was obtained through a developed questionaire for 796 students attending different high schools in Amasya and 2x2 Achievement Goals Questionnaires. For the analyses of the data t-test, one-way variance analysis and (LSD) test to determine the differerence among the groups in the variance analysis and ki-square test were used. Furthermore, descriptive statistical scores that the students got from the scale were presented. When the averages investigated, it is seen that learning approach sub-scale average scores are the highest and performance avoidance average scores are the lowest. It is found out that female students have higher average scores related to learning approach and learning avoidance sub-scale whereas the male students have higher average scores in performance approach and performance avoidance sub-scale. There has seen no difference in the class level success purpose tendency average scores of the students related to the class levels. When the scores of the students related to the high school type investigated, there has seen no difference in the learning avoidance sub-scale average scores regarding to the type of school. However, there is a statistically difference in the average scores of the other sub-scale. There is a meaningful relationship between the success perception of the students and success purpose tendency sub-scale in which the students got the highest scores. The adoption in the the percentage of learning approach tendency of the students who accept themselves partially successful is higher than the percentage of learning approach tendency of the students who see themselves partially unsuccessful.The adoption in the the percentage of learning avoidance and performance avoidance tendency of the students who accept themselves partially unsuccessful is higher than the percentage of the performance approach tendency of the students who see themselves unsuccessful.
Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file.
Özet
Bu araştırmanın amacı öğrencilerin başarı amaç yönelimlerini lise türü değişkeni açısından incelemektir. Veriler Amasya ilindeki farklı liselerde öğrenim gören 796 öğrenciden geliştirilen anket formu ve 2x2 Başarı Amaç Yönelimi Ölçeği aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde t-testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi ve varyans analizinde farklı bulunan grupların tespiti için asgari önemli fark (LSD) testi ve ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca öğrencilerin ölçekten aldıkları puanların tanımlayıcı istatistikleri sunulmuştur. Ortalamalar incelendiğinde öğrenme yaklaşma alt ölçeği puan ortalamasının en yüksek, performans kaçınma alt ölçeği puan ortalamasının ise en düşük olduğu saptanmıştır. Öğrenme yaklaşma ve öğrenme kaçınma alt ölçeklerinde kızların, performans yaklaşma ve performans kaçınma alt ölçeklerinde ise erkeklerin puan ortalaması daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin sınıf düzeyleri başarı amaç yönelimi puan ortalamaları sınıf düzeyine göre farklılık elde edilmemiştir. Öğrencilerin lise türüne göre puanları incelendiğinde öğrenme kaçınma alt ölçeği puan ortalamalarının lise türüne göre farklılık göstermediği; diğer alt ölçek puan ortalamalarında ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde farklılık bulunduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin başarı algılarıyla en yüksek puan aldıkları başarı amaç yönelimi alt ölçeği arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır. Kendini kısmen başarılı ve başarılı gören öğrencilerin öğrenme yaklaşma yönelimini benimseme yüzdesi kısmen başarısız ve başarısız görenlerden fazladır. Kısmen başarısız öğrencilerde öğrenme kaçınma ve performans kaçınma yönelimini benimseme yüzdesi, başarısız gören öğrencilerde ise performans yaklaşma yönelimini benimseyen öğrenci yüzdesi diğerlerinden fazladır.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ablard, K. E. ve Lipschultz, R. E. (1998). Self regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 94- 101.
Agbuga, B. ve Xiang, P (2008). Achievement Goalsand Their Relationsto Self-Reported Persistence/Effort in Secondary Physical Education: A Trichotomous Achievement Goal Framework. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 179-191.
Ağbuğa, B. (2014). 3 x 2 Başarı Hedef Modeli Ölçeğinin Türk Lisans Öğrencileri İçin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 25(3), 109–117
Akın, A. (2006). 2X2 Başarı Yönelimleri Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 1-13.
Akın, A. (2008). Self-compassion and Achievement Goals: A Structural Equation ModelingApproach. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 31,1-15.
Akın, A. ve Arslan, S. (2014). The relationships between achievement goal orientations and grit. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(175), 267-274
Akpur, U. (2016). The explanatory and predictive relationship pattern between university students’ goal orientation behaviours and their academic achievement. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(17), 1650-1658.
Albaili. M. A. (1998). Goal orientations. Cognitive strategies and academic achievement of United Arab Emirates college students. Educational Psychology, 18(2), 195–203.
Ames, C. ve Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structuresa, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Antoniou, F. (2014). One for All or All for One? Do Principal’s and Teacher’s Goal Orientations Affect Students‟ Achievement in Reading, Spelling and Vocabulary? Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., 131, 484-490. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.153.
Arslan, A. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının amaç yönelimleri ile yapılandırmacılığa yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 107-122
Arslan, S. ve Akın, A. (2015). 2x2 Başarı Yönelimleri Ölçeği (Revize Formu): Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Sakarya UniversityJournal of Education, 5(1),7-15.
Aydın, S. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının başarı amaç yönelimleri ve akademik öz-yeterliklerinin yapısal eşitlik modeliyle incelenmesi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9(2), 221-230.
Barron, K. E., Finney, S. J., Davis, S. L. & Owens, K. M. (2003). Achievement Goal Pursuit: Are Different Goals Activated and More Beneficial in Different Types of Academic Situations? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 21-25.
Bartels J. ve Magun-Jackson (2009). Approach- avoidence motivation and metacognitive self regulation: The role of need for achievement and fear of failure. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 459-463.
Buldur, S. (2014). Öğrencilerin sınıf-içi değerlendirme ortamına ilişkin algıları ile başarı amaç oryantasyonları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Cinsiyet Perspektifi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 213-225.
Conroy, D. E., Elliot, A. J. ve Hofer, S. M. (2003). A 2X2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: Evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25, 456−476.
Dinç, Z. F. (2010). Relationship between Achievement Goal Orientation and Physical Self-perception among Students Attending Physical Education Teaching. World Applied SciencesJournal, 11(6), 662-668.
Dweck. C. S. ve Leggett. E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot& C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
Elliot, A. J. ve Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
Elliot, A. J. ve Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
Elliot, A. ve McGregor, H. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
Finney, S. J., Pieper, S. L. ve Barron, K. E. (2004). Examining the psychometric properties of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a general academic context. Educationaland Psychological Measurement, 64, 365−382.
Freudenthaler, H. H., Spinath B. ve Neubauer A.C. (2008). Predicting school achievement in boys and girls. European Journal of Personality, 22(3), 231-245.
Green, B. A. ve Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on Achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192.
Hanrahan, J. S. ve Cerin, E. (2009). Gender, level of participation, andtype of sport: Differences in achievement goal orientation and attributional style. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12 (2009), 508-512.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., ve Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in thedevelopment of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105-122.
Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B. ve Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398-416.
Isoard-Gautheur, S., Guillet-Descas, E. ve Duda, J. L. (2013). How to achieve in elite training centers without burning out? An achievement goal theory perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 72-83.
İzci, E. ve Koç, S. (2012). Pedogojik formasyon eğitimi alan öğrencilerin başarı yönelim düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(8), 31-43.
Kadıoğlu, C. ve Kondakçı, E. U. (2014). Relationship between learning strategies and goal orientations: A multilevel analysis. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 56, 1-22, http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.56.4
Kaplan, A. ve Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 330-358.
Küçükoğlu, A., Kaya, H. İ. ve Turan, A. (2010). Sınıf öğretmenliği ABD öğrencilerinin başarı yönelimi algılarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Atatürk Üniversitesi ve Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Örneği). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 121-135.
Lemyre, P., Roberts, G. C. ve Ommundsen, Y. (2002). Achievement goal orientations, perceived ability, and sportspersonship in youth soccer. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 120–136.
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C. ve Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students‘ Goal Orientations and Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514– 523.
Middleton, M. J., Kaplan, A. ve Midgley, C. (2004). The change in middle school students’ achievement goals in mathematics over time. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 289– 311.
Murayama, K., Elliot, A. ve Yamagata, S. (2011). Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance achievement goals: A broader analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 238-256.
Özgüngör, S. (2003). Mükemmeliyetçilik ve özerklik destekleyici davranışların amaç tarzları ile ilişkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 28(127), 25-30.
Özgüngör, S. (2014). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Benlik Saygısı Düzeyine Göre Kimlik Statüleri ile Başarı Yönelimleri Arasındaki İlişki. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 33-46.
Pajares, F. ve Cheong, Y. F. (2003). Achievement goal orientations in writing: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 437–455.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J. ve Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583-597.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92104.
Rawsthorne, L. J. ve Elliot, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 326-344.
Régner, I., Loose, F. ve Dumas, F. (2009). Students’ perceptions of parental and teacher academic involvement: Consequences on achievement goals. EuropeanJournal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 263-277.
Rosas, J. S. (2015). Validation of theAchievement Goal Questionnaire – Revised in Argentinean University Students (A-AGQ-R). Int.J.Psychol.Res., 8(1), 10-23
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goaland self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R. ve Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: theory, research, andapplications (3rd ed.). UpperSaddleRiver, N.J. :Pearson/Merrill PrenticeHall.
Smith, L. ve Sinclair, K. E. (2005). Empirical evidence for multiple goals: A gender-based, senior high school student perspective. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 5, 55-70.
Soltaninejad, M. (2015). InvestigatingPredictive Role of 2x2 Achievement Goal Orientations on Learning Strategies with Structural Equation Modeling. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3), 21-30.
Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Lochbaum, M. R. ve Stevenson, S. J. (2009). Sport Ability Beliefs, 2 x 2 Achievement Goals, and Intrinsic Motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(2), 303-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599565
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students’ Motivation, Cognition and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
