Validity and reliability of badminton-specific Reactive Agility Test<p>Badmintona özgü geliştirilen Reaktif Çeviklik Testinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği

Authors

  • Mehmet Yıldız Afyon Kocatepe University
  • Uğur Fidan Afyon Kocatepe University

Keywords:

Badminton, reactive agility, test, reliability, validity, reaktif çeviklik, güvenirlik, geçerlik

Abstract

Many laboratory and field tests are used in the literature to measure agility. The aim of the present study was to investigate the reliability and validity of a new Reactive Agility Test developed for badminton. A total of fourty male [ 20 elites (age: 20.8 ± 2.98 year, height: 174.55 ± 12.03 cm, weight: 65.70 ± 14.41 kg) and 20 sub-elites (age: 22.20±1,51, height: 170.01 ± 05.80 cm, weight: 62.45 ± 6,45 kg)] badminton players took part in the present study. For validity, the difference and relationship between newly developed reactive agility and planned changing direction tests in terms of elit and sub-elit players was examined. In the reliability measurements of test-retest, The Reactive Agility Test at same route was performed twice. Independent sample t test was carried out in order to detect the difference among the groups in the search for validity. The identification of the relations between the two different tests was performed with linear regression analysis. The reliability of test-retest was tried to be estimated with the coefficient of variances and intraclass correlation coefficient, and the Bland Altman method. In addition, a systematic difference between the test and the retest was estimated with the paired t test. At the end of the study, while there was not a significant difference found in the rates of planned changing direction of the elit and sub-elit players, it was detected that reactive agility rates were better in the elit players (7.14±4.85 sec and 9.87±5.07 sec, respectively). Moreover, a high coefficient determination was revealed between two tests (r2: 0.63, p<0.01). In the comparison of test-retest, a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.930) and a very low coefficient of variances (4.7) were found. Furthermore, it was observed in the Bland Altman graph that a 95% of concordance range of the data obtained between two measurements was a good and narrow concordance.  In conclusion, it was determined that the new developed badminton specific Reactive Agility Test is a valid and reliable measurement method and it is suggested that this test protocol can be used to enhance and monitor reactive agility ability of badminton players.

Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file.

 

Özet

Literatürde çevikliğin ölçülmesi amacıyla birçok laboratuvar ve saha testi kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı badminton sporuna göre düzenlenmiş Reaktif Çeviklik Testinin güvenirlik ve geçerliğinin araştırılmasıdır. Araştırmaya toplam kırk erkek [20 elit (yaş: 20,8±2,98 yıl, boy uzunluğu: 174,55±12,03 cm, vücut ağırlığı:65,70±14,41 kg) ve 20 sub-elit (yaş: 22,20±1,51 yıl, boy uzunluğu: 170,01±05,80 cm, vücut ağırlığı:62,45±6,45 kg)] badminton oyuncusu katılmıştır. Geçerlik için yeni geliştirilen reaktif çeviklik ile planlı yön değiştirme testlerinin elit ve sub-elit katılımcılar arasındaki istatistiksel karşılaştırması ve ilişkisi analiz edilmiştir. Test-tekrar test güvenirlik ölçümlerinde aynı rotadaki reaktif çeviklik testi birer gün arayla iki kez uygulanmıştır. Geçerlik çalışmasında gruplar arası farkın belirlenmesi için bağımsız değişken t testi ve testler arası ilişkinin fonksiyonel olarak açıklanması ve bu ilişkinin bir modelle tanımlanması için basit doğrusal regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Test-tekrar test güvenirliği varyasyon katsayısı, sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı ve Bland Altman metodu ile kestirim edilmiştir. Ayrıca test- tekrar test arasında sistematik bir farkın olup olmadığı eşleştirilmiş t testi ile sınanmıştır.  Çalışma sonunda elit ve sub-elit oyuncuların planlı yön değiştirme bulguları anlamlı bir fark bulunmazken, reaktif çeviklik derecelerinin elit oyuncularda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklı (sırasıyla 7,14±4.85 sn ve 9,87±5,07 sn) şekilde düşük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bununla beraber her iki test arasında yüksek düzeyde  bir açıklayıcılık katsayısı tespit (r2: 0,63, p<0.01) edilmiştir. Test- tekrar test karşılaştırılmasında yüksek bir sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı (0,930) ve çok düşük varyasyon katsayısı (4,7) belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca Bland-Altman grafiğinde iki ölçüm arasında elde edilen tüm verilerin %95 uyum aralığının dar ve iyi bir uyum gösterdiği gözlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak,  badminton sporuna göre düzenlenmiş Reaktif Çeviklik Testinin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm yöntemi olduğu tespit edilmiştir ve badminton oyuncularının reaktif çeviklik becerilerinin geliştirilmesinde ve gelişimlerinin takibinde kullanılabileceği önerilmektedir. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Mehmet Yıldız, Afyon Kocatepe University

Yrd. Doç. Dr., Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu,  Antrenörlük Eğitimi ABD

Uğur Fidan, Afyon Kocatepe University

Yrd. Doç. Dr., Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Biyomedikal Mühendisliği ABD

References

Appelbaum LG, Erickson G. (2016). Sports vision training: A review of the state-of-the-art in digital training techniques. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-30.

Barnes JL, Schilling BK, Falvo MJ, Weiss LW, Creasy AK. (2007). Relationship of jumping and agility performance in female volleyball athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21(4), 1192-6.

Farrow D, Young W, Bruce L. (2005). The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: A new methodology. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 8(1), 52-60.

Fidan, u., Yıldız, M., & User, M. A. (2016). Taşınabilir Çeviklik Ölçüm Sisteminin Tasarımı ve Gerçekleştirilmesi. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 5(1), 35-45.

Frederick, M. F. A., Hamid, D. H. T. A. H., Omar, A. H., Hasan, K., Soeed, K., & Zulkapri, I. (2014). Badminton: Specific Movement Agility Testing System. Mohe 2014

Gabbett T, Benton D. (2009). Reactive agility of rugby league players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(1), 212-214.

Hoffman LG, Polan G, Powell J. (1984). The relationship of contrast sensitivity functions to sports vision. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 55(10), 747–752.

Holmberg PM. (2009). Agility training for experienced athletes: A dynamical systems approach. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 31(5), 73-78.

Jeffreys IA. (2011). Task-Based Approach to Developing Context-Specific Agility. Strength And Conditioning Journal, 3(4), 1524-1602.

Karacabey K. (2013). Sporda performans ve çeviklik testleri. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10 (1), 1693-1704.

Laby DM, Davidson JL, Rosenbaum LJ, Strasser C, Mellman MF, Rosenbaum AL, Kirschen DG. (1996). The visual function of professional baseball players. American journal of ophthalmology, 122(4), 476-485.

Mann DTY, Williams AM, Ward P, Janelle MC. (2007). Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise in Sport: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 457-4

Oliver J, Meyers RW. (2009). Reliability and generality of measures of acceleration, planned agility, and reactive agility. International Journal of Sports Physiology Performance, 4, 345-354.

Serpell BG, Ford M, Young WB. (2010). The development of a new test of agility for rugby league. J Strength Cond Res, 24(12), 3270–3277.

Sheppard JM, Young WB. (2006). Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(9), 919-932.

Starks JL, Ericsson KA. (2003). Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Tsubouchi S, Demura S, Uchida Y, Matsuura Y, Uchida H. (2016). Agility Characteristics of Various Athletes Based on a Successive Choice-reaction Test. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 4(4), 98-102.

Uchida Y, Kudoh D, Higuchi T, Honda M, Kanosue K. (2013). Dynamic visual acuity in baseball players is due to superior tracking abilities. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 45(2), 319–325.

Vickers JN, Adolphe RM. (1997). Gaze behavior during a ball tracking and aiming skill. International Journal of Sports Vision, 4(1), 18–27.

Voss MW, Kramer AF, Basak C, Parkash RS, Roberts B. (2010). Are expert athletes ‘expert’ in the cognitive laboratory? A meta-analytic review of cognition and sport expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 812–826.

Williams AM, Davids K, Williams JG. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport. London: E & FN Spon.

Young WB, James R, Montgomery JR. (2002). Is muscle power related to running speed with changes of direction? J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 42, 282–288.

Young W, Farrow D. (2006). A Review of Agility: Practical Applications for strenght and conditioning. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 28(5), 24-38.

Young BW, Willey B. (2010). Analysis of a reactive agility field test. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(3), 376–378.

Zemkova E, Hamar D. (2014). Agility performance in athletes of different sport specializations. Acta Gymnica, 44(3), 133-140.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-31

How to Cite

Yıldız, M., & Fidan, U. (2018). Validity and reliability of badminton-specific Reactive Agility Test&lt;p&gt;Badmintona özgü geliştirilen Reaktif Çeviklik Testinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(1), 594–603. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/5211

Issue

Section

Physical Education and Sport Sciences