“Thinking Creatively with Sounds and Words: Sounds and Images IIA” validity study in the Turkish language

Authors

  • Aslı Kaya Dokuz Eylül University
  • Sermin Bilen Dokuz Eylül University

Keywords:

Creativity, evaluation of creativity, thinking creatively with sounds and words, the Sounds and Images IIA, scale adaptation

Abstract

Creativity, although it had existed since the existence of humanity, nowadays it is gaining more and more importance. In this process, creativity have been addressed in a variety of ways such as the studies of development on creativity and determination of the level of creativity. For this reason some scales or tests have been developed. Developed tests in a certain culture or language have reflect this culture and language’s understanding and qualifications. It is important to be done in a systematic way to test or scale adaptation studies in order to be applicable and meaningful in different culture or language.

The purpose of this research is to study the validity of the Turkish language of the Test of Thinking Creatively with Sounds and Words: Sounds and Images IIA developed by Torrance and Cunnington.

Language validity study was conducted in the academic year 2014-2015 by Dokuz Eylül University Buca Education Faculty Department of Foreign Language Education and Literature Faculty Department of Translation and Interpreting 4. Grade students (n=55). For the reliability and validity study, the Sounds and Images IIA Turkish form was conducted in the academic year 2014-2015 by Dokuz Eylül University, Adnan Menderes University, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Education Faculty Department of music Education 1.- 4. Grade students (n=276).

The reliability of the test was determined through the value of Cronbach’s Alpha. The Cronbach’s Alpha value of the Sounds and Images IIA English form was determined .64, for the Sounds and Images IIA Turkish form was determined .61 [.60 ≤ α < .90]. To determine the correlation between English and Turkish forms the correlation analysis was made. The correlation was determined .81 and there is a positive significant relationship between scores [r=.81, p<.01]. There isn’t statistically significant difference between the English and Turkish form scores [t=.29, p>.01].

The Sounds and Images IIA Turkish Form Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient is .61, Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient is .59 [.60 ≤ α < .90]. This result shows that the Sounds and Images IIA Turkish Form is a reliable measuring instrument for Turkish language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Aslı Kaya, Dokuz Eylül University

Res. Asst., Dokuz Eylul University, Buca Faculty of Education, Department of Music Education

Sermin Bilen, Dokuz Eylül University

Asst. Prof. Dr., Dokuz Eylul University, Buca Faculty of Education, Department of Music Education

References

Batıbay, D., Piji, D. (2006). The Relationship between Prospective Musical Teachers' Achievements in Music Lessons and Their Musical Creativity (Müzik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Müzik Dederslerindeki Başarıları ile Müzikal Yaratıcılıkları Arasındaki İlişki). MU Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences. Issue 23, 51-68.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., (2009). Data Analysis Guide for Social Sciences (Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö., Köklü, Ö. (2013). Statistics for Social Sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications.

Can, A. (2013). Quantitative Data Analysis in the Scientific Research Process with SPSS (SPSS ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications.

Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Multivariate Statistics SPSS and Lisrel Applications for Social Sciences (Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve Lisrel Uygulamaları). Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Karasar, N. (2006). Scientific Research Method (Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Khatena, J., Torrance, E.P. (1998). Thinking Creatively with Sound and Words Norms-Technical Manual. USA: Scholastic Testing Service Inc.

Öner, N. (2012). Examples from Psychological Tests Used in Turkey, An Application Source (Türkiye’de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testlerden Örnekler Bir Başvuru Kaynağı). İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Publishing.

Rouquette, M-L. (1992). Creativity (Yaratıcılık). (Gürbüz, I., Trans.). İstanbul: İletişim Publications. (Orginal work published 1989).

Sungur, N. (1992). Creative Thought (Yaratıcı Düşünce). İstanbul: Özgür Publishing-Distribution.

Şencan, H. (2005). Reliability and Validity in Social and Behavioral Measurements (Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Torrance, P., Khatena, P., Cunnington, B. F. (1990). Thinking Creatively with Sound and Words Directions manual and Scoring Guide. USA: Scholastic Testing Service Inc.

Thinking Creatively with Sounds and Words (TCSW) <http://ststesting.com/2005gifttcs w.html> (Last access date: 17.11.2017).

Üstündağ, T. (2011). Journey to Creativity (Yaratıcılığa Yolculuk). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications.

Yavuzer, H. S. (1989). Creativity (Yaratıcılık). İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.

Yılmaz, V., Çelik, H. E. (2009). Structural Equality Modeling with LISREL- I (LISREL ile Yapısal eşitlik Modellmesi- I). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-06

How to Cite

Kaya, A., & Bilen, S. (2017). “Thinking Creatively with Sounds and Words: Sounds and Images IIA” validity study in the Turkish language. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 3956–3967. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/5061

Issue

Section

Educational Evaluation, Measurement and Research