Cross country study of school environment effects on reading comprehension performance<p>Okul ortamlarının okuduğunu anlama performansı üzerinde etkisinin ülkeler arası incelenmesi

Authors

  • Özen Yıldırım Pamukkale University

Keywords:

Programme for international student assessment (PISA), reading comprehension, school enviroment, cross-country studies, Uluslararası öğrenci değerlendirme programı (PISA), okuduğunu anlama, okul ortamı, ülkeler arası karşılaştırma

Abstract

Reading comprehension skills is in the basic skills that are tried to gain in students. It is likely that a person who has not reached the reading comprehension skill will face many difficulties, whether in daily life or professional life.

In the study, the characteristics of school environment of different countries have been determined and the similarities and differences between the countries have been revealed based on the results. The sample included students from Netherlands, Korea and Turkey in PISA 2009 practice. Data was used from reading achievement test and from school questionnaire. For analyzes two levels of Hierarchical Linear Models was used. According to the findings, the most valuable and common variable is the school size, than student behavior for Holland and Korea. The number of the girl at school and student-teacher ratio variables are significant for Turkey.

Extended English abstract is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file.

Özet

Öğrencilerde kazandırılmaya çalışılan temel beceriler içerisinde okuduğunu anlama becerisi gelmektedir.  Okuduğunu anlama becerisine erişememiş bir birey günlük hayatta ve profesyonel hayatta birçok zorlukla karşılaşması muhtemeldir. Araştırmada, öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama performanslarıyla ile ilişkili olduğu düşünülen okul düzeyindeki değişkenlerin etkisi araştırılmıştır. PISA 2009 uygulamasına katılan Hollanda, Kore ve Türkiye’deki öğrenciler örneklemi oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama araçları PISA 2009 okuma becerileri testi ve okul anketleridir. İki düzeyli Hiyerarşik Doğrusal Modellerler kullanılarak analizler yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre Hollanda ve Kore’de öğrencinin okuduğunu anlama performansı okul içi davranışlar ve okul mevcuduna göre değişmektedir. Türkiye’de öğrencilerin okuma performansları öğrenci öğretmen oranına ve okuldaki kız öğrenci oranına göre değişmektedir.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Özen Yıldırım, Pamukkale University

Assist. Prof. Dr., Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education Measurement and Assessment Department

References

Allington, R. L. (Ed.). (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Alvermann, D. E. (2001). Reading adolescents' reading identities: looking back to see a head. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44 (8), 676-691 Retrieved from: https://webpages.uncc.edu/~amedina1/21%20C%20lit/cultural%20literacy.pdf

American Federation of Teachers. (AFT). (1999). Building on the best, learning from what works: exemplary center for reading instruction. [Online] Retrieved from http://www.readingrockets.org/article/22888/

Banerjee, A., S. Cole, E. Duflo, and L. Linden, (2007). Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1235-1264. doi: 10.3386/w11904 View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11904

Carter, C. Bishop, J. and Kravits, S.L. (2011). Keys to Effective Learning (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Allyn & Bacon

DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., and Elliott, S. N. (2002). A model of academic enablers and elementary reading/language arts achievement. School Psychology Review, 31, 298–312. [Online] Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0036402166&origin=inward&txGid=e3d6125117f1f76c3552f25caf9587a4

Demir, B., S. ve Yıldırım, Ö. (2016) Okulda ve okul dışında bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin kullanımının öğrencilerin PISA 2012 performansıyla ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 1, 251-262. Retrived from http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/210042

Eğitimi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı (EARGED), (2010). PISA 2009 ulusal ön raporu. Ankara: Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Yayınları. [Online] Retrieved from http://earged.meb.gov.tr/pdf/ pisa2009rapor.pdf.

Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T. and Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-on-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (4), 605-619. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.92.4.605 View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.4.605

European Commission. (EC), (2001). European report on the quality of school education: sixteen quality ındicators. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of European Communities.

Freeman, C. E. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls and women: 2004. NCES 2005-016, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: GPO. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005016.pdf

Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C. and Mehta, P. (1998). “The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure at-risk children”: Erratum. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.235 View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.235

Hammond, D., L., and Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: what teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581 View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.

Karatay, H. (2007). İlköğretim Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının okuduğunu anlama becerileri üzerine alan araştırması. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Kutlu, O.,Yildirim, O. ve Bilican, S. (2011). The factors that predict reading and listening comprehension skills of elementary level 5thgrade Turkish students.In G. Leyla Uzun and Ümit Bozkurt, (Eds), Theorical and applied researches on Turkish language teaching (pp. 381-396) Essen: Die Blau

Eule, Germany.

Kutlu, O., Yıldırım, O. ve Bilican, S., (2010). The investigation of 5th grade Turkish students’ comprehension scores accordingto different variables. Word Academy of Science, Enginieering and Technology, 4(6), 1102-1106 Retrieved from: http://waset.org/publications/8732/the-investigation-of-5th-grade-turkish-students-comprehension-scores-according-to-different-variables

Koth, C. W., Bradshaw, C. P. and Leaf, P. J. (2008). A multilevel study of predictors of student perceptions of school climate: The effect of classroom-level factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 96-104. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.96 View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.96

Kotte, D., Liez, P. and Lopez, M. M. (2005). Factors influencing reading achievement in Germany and Spain: Evidence from PISA 2000, International Education Journal, 6 (1), 113-124. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ854960

Linnakylä, P., Malin, A. and Taube, K. (2004) Factors behind low reading literacy achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48 (3), 231-249. doi: 10.1080/00313830410001695718 View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830410001695718

Lee, V. E. and Loeb, L. (2000). School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers' attitudes and students' achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37 (1), 3-31. doi: 10.3102/00028312037001003 View Article: DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001003

Ma, X. (2000). Health outcomes of elementary school students in New Brunswick. Evaluation Review, 24 (5), 435– 456. doi: 10.1177/0193841x0002400501 View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x0002400501

Ma. X. and Williams, J. D. (2004). School disciplinary climate: characteristics and effects on eighth grade achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 2 (50), 169-188.

Mac An Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinites, sexualites and schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Moje, E.B. (2002). But where are the youth? Integrating youth culture into literacy theory. Educational Theory, 52 (1), 97–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00097.x View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00097.x

Ota, K. R., and DuPaul, G. J. (2002). Task engagement and mathematics performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects of supplemental computer instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 242–257. doi: 10.1521/scpq.17.3.242.20881 View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.17.3.242.20881

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Paris.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (2012). PISA 2009 technical report, PISA, OECD Publishing.

Perie, M., Grigg, W., and Donahue, P. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading, 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED486463.pdf

Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) (2003). PIRLS international report. US: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2001i/PIRLS2001_Pubs_IR.html

Schneider, B., Wyse, A. E. and Keesler, V. (2007). Is small really better? Testing some assumptions about high school size. In T. Loveless and F. M. Hess (Eds.), Brookings Papers on Education Policy 2006/2007 (pp. 15–47). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Song, H., and Kang, T. (2012). Evaluating the Impacts of CT Use: A multi-level analysis with hierarchical linear modeling. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4),132-140.

Weiss, E.M., Kemmlera, G., Deisenhammerb, E.A., W. Fleischhackera, W.W. and Delazer, M. (2003). Sex differences in cognitive functions. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 863–875. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00288-x View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00288-x

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2017-12-22

How to Cite

Yıldırım, Özen. (2017). Cross country study of school environment effects on reading comprehension performance&lt;p&gt;Okul ortamlarının okuduğunu anlama performansı üzerinde etkisinin ülkeler arası incelenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 4453–4463. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/5034

Issue

Section

Educational Administration and Management