An alternative model of reflective teacher supervision

Authors

  • Süleyman Davut Göker Artvin Coruh University

Keywords:

Supervision, reflective supervision, teacher supervision, professional leadership

Abstract

Focusing on the promotion of reflectivity during practice teaching amongst teachers, this study aims to explore the impact of a reflective teacher supervision model (RTSM) developed by Goker (2006a) on the development of instructional skills of teachers. Two groups of elementary and secondary school teachers from different fields (24 in total) registered for an MA course, American University, Cyprus were compared to their development of instructional skills. The research approach used for this study was both quantitive and qualitative, which included: (a) conducting a sample lesson based on the pinciples of reflective teaching, (b) expessing results both with statistical data obtained from the pre test and post test results of the Clarity Observation Instrument (Metcalf, 1989) and using interviews and surveys, and anecdotal data.  Findings have significant implications for how reflective supervision can be a means to develop instructional skills. Recommendations for teacher education programs and the student teachers are also made.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Süleyman Davut Göker, Artvin Coruh University

Assist. Prof. Dr., Artvin Çoruh University, Education Faculty

References

Acheson, K.A., & Gall, M.D. (2003). Clinical supervision and teacher development: Preservice and inservice applications (5th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bullock, A. A., & Hawk, P. P. (2005). Developing a teaching portfolio: A guide for preservice and practicing teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Costa, A., & Garmston, R. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2009). Revisiting professional learning communites at work: New insights for improving schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Emans, R. (1983). Implementing the knowledge base: Rede- signing the function of cooperating teachers and college supervisors. Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 14–18.

Follo, E. (1999). The voices of student teachers (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 437 344).

Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action (pp. 1-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Göker, S. D. (2006a). Leading for learning: Reflective management in EFL. Theory into Practice. Spring 2006, Volume. 45, No. 2, pp. 187-196.

Göker, S. D. (2006b). Impact of peer coaching on self-efficacy and instructional skills in TEFL teacher education. System, An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics. 2006. 34/2 pp. 239-254.

Göker, S. D. (2012). Reflective leadership in EFL.Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8): 1355.

Göker, S. D. (2015) .Denetim sürecinde ogretmen öğrenmesi için gelistirici bir geribildirim modeli. Asos Journal. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 3(10): 817-826.

Hoy, W. K. & Woolfolk, A. E. (1990). Socialization of student teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 279-300.

Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.

Kagan, D. M., & Tippins, D. J. (1993). Benefits of crisis: The genesis of a school–university partnership. Action in Teacher Education, 15(4), 68–73.

Koehler, V. R. (1988). Barriers to effective supervision of student teaching: A field study. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 28–34.

Kofman, F., & Senge, P. (l993). Communities of commitment: The heart of the learning organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 5–23.

Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide to applied research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Metcalf, K. (1989). An investigation of the efficacy of a research-based regimen of skill development on the instructional clarity of pre-service teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus. National StaV D.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (l996). Leadership for the schoolhouse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Shulman, Lee S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57, no. 1.

Sia, A.P. (1992). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceived efficacy in teaching environmental education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Association for Environmental Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Tucker, P. D., Stronge, J. H., & Gareis, C. R. (2002). Handbook on teacher portfolios for evaluation and professional development. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-24

How to Cite

Göker, S. D. (2016). An alternative model of reflective teacher supervision. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(2), 3560–3570. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3868

Issue

Section

Educational Administration and Management