Copyright and the Internet: The case of Napster

Authors

  • Gülbin Kıranoğlu Kocaeli University

Keywords:

Internet, Information Society, Information Revolution, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Postindustrial Capitalism, Globalization, Mp3, Peer-2-Peer Sharing, Napster

Abstract

In the postindustrial world, information is not only a revolutionary phenomenon but also a valuable commodity of exchange, thereby protected by intellectual property rights, copyrights and patents. The interactive nature of the Internet, however, has complicated the notion of intellectual property leading to the debates of whether or not the Internet should be regulated on such basis. This article aims to understand the turn-of-the-21st-century tension between the record industry and the innovative technology of Napster, regarding the question of validity of the legal concept of copyright in an age of Information Revolution. In this paper, the record industry’s attack on Napster due to its development of “peer-2-peer sharing” service, as one of the earliest sample cases concerning the criminalization of the Cyberspace in relation to the issue of copyright will be examined. To achieve this, following an outline of different approaches to the concepts of information society and information revolution, I will address the fundamental question of whether the notion of intellectual property promotes or controls innovation by focusing on the lawsuit of Napster, Inc. vs. A&M Records, Inc. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Gülbin Kıranoğlu, Kocaeli University

Lecturer, Kocaeli University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Western Languages and Literatures, TURKEY, [email protected].

She holds undergraduate and graduate degrees in American Culture and Literature from Başkent University, Turkey where she also worked as a research assistant. She wrote her MA thesis on the cultural production concerning Generation X, the American youth of 1980s and 1990s. She recently received her PhD degree in Communications from Ankara University, Turkey. In her doctoral dissertation, she studied the urban nostalgia of İstanbul in the mid-20th century. Currently, she is working as a lecturer at Kocaeli University and teaching courses such as "American Literature", "Introduction to Literature", and "Cultural Studies" since 2006.

References

Aguiar, L., & Waldfogel, J. (2016). Even the losers get lucky sometimes: New products and the evolution of music quality since Napster. Information Economics and Policy, (34), 1–15.

Barbrook, R. (2005). The Hi-Tech gift economy. First Monday, (Special Issue #3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/viewArticle/1517/1432

Barlow, J. P. (1994, March 1). The economy of ideas. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/1994/03/economy-ideas/

Barlow, J. P. (1996, February 8). A declaration of the independence of Cyberspace. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence

Carter, D., & Rogers, I. (2014). Fifteen years of “Utopia”: Napster, Pitchfork as technologies of democratization. First Monday, 19(10), 1–17.

Facing the music. (2000, June 14). Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/entertainment-jan-june00-napster_6-14/

Garofalo, R. (1999). From music publishing to mp3: Music and industry in the twentieth century. American Music, (17), 318–353.

Geray, H. (2002). İletişim ve teknoloji. Uluslararası birikim düzeninde yeni medya politikaları. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi.

Johnson, D. R., & Post, D. (1996). Law and borders - the rise of law in Cyberspace. First Monday, 1(1), 1–17.

Jones, S. (1993). Who fought the law? The American music industry and the global popular music market. In T. Bennett, S. Frith, L. Grossberg, J. Shepherd, & G. Turner (Eds.), Rock and popular music: politics, policies, institutions (pp. 83–95). London and NY: Routledge.

Lessig, L. (2006). Code (Version 2.0). NY: Basic Books. Retrieved from http://codev2.cc/download+remix/Lessig-Codev2.pdf

Mattelart, A. (2001). İletişimin dünyasallaşması. İstanbul: İletişim.

Napster (pay service). (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napster_(pay_service)

Negativland. (n.d.). Negativland’s tenets of free appropriation. Retrieved from http://www.negativland.com/news/?page_id=10

P., A. (2002, September 13). Online exchange with Simon Frith, part 2. Retrieved April 30, 2016, from http://rockcriticsarchives.com/interviews/simonfrith/02.html

Raymond, E. S. (1998). The cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday, 3(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/578/499

Rutten, P. (1993). Popular music policy: A contested area - the Dutch experience. In T. Bennett, S. Frith, L. Grossberg, J. Shepherd, & G. Turner (Eds.), Rock and popular music: politics, policies, institutions (pp. 37–51). London and NY: Routledge.

Shapiro, A. L. (1999). The control revolution: How the Internet is putting individuals in charge and changing the world we know. NY: Public Affairs.

Spitz, D., & Hunter, S. D. (2005). Contested codes: The social construction of Napster. The Information Society, (21), 169–180. http://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490951890

Thomas, M. W. (2001). Napster and the future of copyright law in a digital age. The Internet Law Journal. Retrieved from http://til.com/content/ipheadline04140102.htm

Timisi, N. (2003). Yeni iletişim teknolojileri ve demokrasi. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.

Webster, F. (1995). Information and advanced capitalism. In Theories of the Information Society. London and NY: Routledge.

Yüksel, M. (2001). Küreselleşme, ulusal hukuk ve Türkiye. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-07

How to Cite

Kıranoğlu, G. (2016). Copyright and the Internet: The case of Napster. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(2), 2758–2767. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3839

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016)

Section

Journalism & Mass Communication

License

Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi ISSN:1303-5134
International Journal of Human Sciences ISSN:2458-9489
 
is an "Open Access Journal" that uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of open access, users take the right of read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles.

Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.

©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.