The effect of concept mapping on students’ academic achievement and attitude in science education<p>Fen eğitiminde kavram haritaları kullanımının akademik başarı ve tutuma etkisi

Authors

  • Arif Çömek Marmara University
  • Orhan Akınoğlu Marmara University
  • Ersin Elmacı Marmara University
  • Tuğba Gündoğdu MEB

Keywords:

Academic achievement, attitude, concept mapping, constructivism, science education, Akademik başarı, tutum, kavram haritaları, yapılandırmacılık, fen eğitimi

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of concept mapping as a learning strategy in science classes on students’ academic achievement and attitude. The research employed a randomized pre-test post-test control group design. Data collected from 60 sixth grade students participated in the study from a randomly selected secondary school in Turkey. During a 5-weeks period, the experimental group students (N=30) used the paper based concept mapping method while the control group students (N=30) were taught with the traditional approach according to the science and technology education curriculum for light and sound subject. Both groups were taught by the same teacher who is experienced using concept mapping in science classes. The data were collected by science achievement test, science attitude scale and personal information form. The reliability coefficient of the achievement test was KR-20=0,76 and Cronbach’s Alpha of the attitude scale was 0,89. SPSS statistical software was used to analyze the data. According to the results, there was a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control group for academic achievement but not for attitude. The experimental group had significantly greater gains from academic achievement test than the control group (t=2,9; p<0,05). On the other hand, experimental group didn’t have significantly better results for attitude scale than the control group (t=0,42, p>0,05).  The findings showed that the paper-and-pencil concept mapping can be used as an effective method for students’ academic achievement in science classes.

 

Özet

eğitiminde kavram haritaları oluşturma uygulamasının altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarına ve derse yönelik tutumlarına etkisini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada yöntem olarak deneysel desenlerden ön test son test kontrol gruplu desen kullanılmıştır. Veriler devlet okulları arasından tesadüfi olarak seçilen bir devlet ortaokulunun 6.sınıflarında öğrenim görmekte olan toplam 60 öğrenciye uygulanan veri toplama araçları ile toplanmıştır. Uygulama çalışmaları toplam 5 hafta sürmüştür. Deney grubundaki öğrenciler (N=30) ışık ve ses ünitesi hakkında kâğıt-kalem ile hazırlanan kavram haritaları ile desteklenmiş eğitimle ders görürken, kontrol grubunda (N=30) ise dersler mevcut fen öğretim programına göre geleneksel olarak işlenmiştir. Her iki grupta da dersleri, kavram haritalarıyla çalışma tecrübesi olan aynı fen öğretmeni işlemiştir. Veriler fen bilgisi başarı testi, fen bilgisi tutum ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır.  Araştırmada kullanılan başarı testinin güvenirlik katsayısı KR-20= 0,76, fen dersine yönelik tutum ölçeğinin Cronbach’s Alpha güvenirlik katsayısı ise 0,89 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre deney grubu ile kontrol grubu öğrencilerinin akademik başarıları arasında deney grubu lehine istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık oluşmuş (t=2,9; p<0,05), tutum testi puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık oluşmamıştır (t=0,42, p>0,05). Bu bulgulara göre kâğıt-kalem ile kavram haritası oluşturma uygulamasının fen derslerinde öğrencilerin akademik başarılarını artırabilecek etkili bir yöntem olarak kullanılabileceği görülmektedir.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Arif Çömek, Marmara University

Assist. Prof. Dr., Marmara University, Faculty of Education

Orhan Akınoğlu, Marmara University

Assoc. Prof. Dr., Marmara University, Faculty of Education

Ersin Elmacı, Marmara University

Res. Assist., Marmara University, Faculty of Education

Tuğba Gündoğdu, MEB

Teacher, Marmara University, Hafize Özal Secondary School

References

Abi‐el‐mona, I., & Adb‐el‐khalick, F. (2008). The influence of mind mapping on eighth graders’ science achievement. School Science and mathematics, 108(7), 298-312.

Akinoglu, O., & Yasar, Z. (2007). The effects of note taking in science education through the mind mapping technique on students' attitudes, academic achievement and concept learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(3), 34-43.

Altinok, H. ve Acikgoz, K. U. (2006). Isbirlikli ve bireysel kavram haritalamanin fen bilgisi dersine yonelik tutum uzerindeki etkileri. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 30, 21-29.

Altunay, A. Y. (2006). Bilgisayar ortaminda hazirlanan kavram haritalarinin bir ogretim materyali olarak fen bilgisi dersinde kullanilmasinin ilkogretim ogrencilerinin basarilarina etkisi. Yayinlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Selcuk Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Konya.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Amma, C. (2005). Effectiveness of computer based mind maps in the learning of biology at the higher secondary level. New Delhi: ICDE International Conference, 2005.

Arslan, A. & Elibol, M. (2015). Egitsel artirilmis gerceklik uygulamalarinin incelenmesi: Android isletim sistemi ornegi. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12 (2), 1792-1817.

Arslan, A., Kirik, A. M., Karaman, M. & Cetinkaya, A. (2015). Lise ve universite ogrencilerinde dijital bagimlilik. Uluslararasi Hakemli Iletisim ve Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi, 8(8). 34-58.

Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational Psychology, New York: Holt, Rinehart ve Winston.

Aykanat, F., Dogru, M. ve Kalender, S. (2005). Bilgisayar destekli kavram haritalari yontemiyle fen ogretiminin ogrenci basarisina etkisi. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 13(2), 391-400.

Balim, A. (2013). Use of technology-assisted techniques of mind mapping and concept mapping in science education: a constructivist study. Irish Educational Studies, 32(4), 437-456.

Batdi, V. (2015). Kavram haritasi teknigi ile geleneksel ogrenme yonteminin kullanilmasinin ogrencilerin basarilari, bilgilerinin kaliciligi ve tutumlarina etkisi: Bir meta-analiz calismasi. Dumlupinar Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 42(2), 93-102.

Bernstein, J. M. (2011). Concept mapping and student success in a college-level environmental studies course. Unpublished mastery thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.

Boujaoude, S. & Attich, M. (2008). The effect of using concept maps as study tools on achievement in chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 233-246.

Boyle, T. (1997). Design for multimedia learning. Prentice-Hall, Inc..

Bramwell-Lalor, S., & Rainford, M. (2014). The Effects of Using Concept Mapping for Improving Advanced Level Biology Students' Lower-and Higher-Order Cognitive Skills. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 839-864.

Broggy, J. & Mcclelland, G. (2008). Undergraduate students’ attitudes towards physics after a concept mapping experience. Third International Conference on Concept Mapping, Talinn, Estonia ve Helsinki, Finland.

Buyukozturk, S. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler icin Veri Analizi El Kitabi. Ankara: PegemA Yayincilik.

Candan, A., Turkmen, L., & Cardak, O. (2006). Kavram haritalamanin ilkogretim ogrencilerinin hareket ve kuvvet kavramini anlamalarina etkisi. Turk Fen Egitimi Dergisi, 3(1), 66-75.

Chawla, J., & Singh, G. (2015). Effect of concept mapping strategy on achievement in chemistry of ix graders in relation to achievement motivation. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 1(24), 53-65.

Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Liang, Y. R. (2014). A cooperative computerized concept-mapping approach to improving students’ learning performance in web-based information-seeking activities. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(1), 19-33.

Cimer, A., & Cimer, S. O. (2002). Ogrencilerin biyoloji konularinin tekrar edilmesinde bir arac olarak kavram haritasi teknigini kullanmaya karsi tutumlari. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi bildiriler kitabi, 16.

Comek, A. (2009). Internetin etkin kullanimi ile ogrenme stillerinin ogretmen adaylarinin akademik basari ve tutumlarina etkisi. (Yayinlanmamis doktora tezi). Marmara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu, Istanbul.

David Tawei, K., Ju-Ling, S., & Su-Huan, H. (2014). The Integration of Concept Mapping in a Dynamic Assessment Model for Teaching and Learning Accounting. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 141-153.

Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 37-60.

Dugger, Jr. W. E., Meade, S. D., Delany, L., & Nichols, C. (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(4), 316.

Evrekli, E., & Balim, A. G. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji ogretiminde zihin haritasi ve kavram karikaturu kullaniminin ogrencilerin akademik basarilarina ve sorgulayici ogrenme becerileri algilarina etkisi. Bati Anadolu Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi (BAED), 1(2), 76-98.

Gedizgil, Z., & Deryakulu, D. (2008). Kavram haritalamanin bilgisayardan hoslanma ve bilgisayar dersine yonelik gudulenme uzerindeki etkisi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 34, 106-115.

Guastello, E. F., Beasley, T. M. & Sinatra, R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 356-364.

Harlen, W. (1985). Teaching and Learning Primary Science. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027.

Hsu, L. (2004). Developing Concept Maps from Problem-Based Learning Scenario Discussions: Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(5),510-518.

Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Chen, N. S., & Ho, H. J. (2014). Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students' learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads. Computers & Education, 71, 77-86.

Jin, H., & Wong, K. Y. (2014). Mapping Conceptual Understanding of Algebraic Concepts: An Exploratory Investigation Involving Grade 8 Chinese Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 683-703.

Jonassen, D. H., Reeves, T. C., Hong, N., Harvey, D., & Peters, K. (1997). Concept Mapping as Cognitive Learning and Assessment Tools. Journal of interactive learning research, 8, 289-308.

Kaptan, F. (1998). Fen ogretiminde kavram haritasi yonteminin kullanilmasi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 14, 95-99.

Karakuyu, Y., & Tuysuz, C. (2011). Elektrik Konusunda Kavram Yanilgilari ve Kavramsal Degisim Yaklasimi. Gaziantep Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2), 867-890.

Kaya, O. N. (2003). Fen egitiminde Kavram haritalari. Pamukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 1(13), 70-79.

Kendirli, B. (2008). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde kavram haritasi kullaniminin ogrenci tutumu, basarisi ve bilgi kaliciligina etkisi.Yayimlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi, Gazi Universitesi, Ankara.

Kilinc, U. A. (2007). Bir ogretim stratejisi olarak kavram haritalarinin kullanimi. Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 4(2), 21-48.

Kinchin, I. M. (2000). Concept mapping in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 61-68.

Kirik, A. M., Arslan, A., Cetinkaya, A. & Gul, M. (2015). A quantitative research on the level of social media addiction among young people in Turkey. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport (IntJSCS), 3(3), 108-122.

Ku, D. T., Shih, J. L., & Hung, S. H. (2014). The Integration of Concept Mapping in a Dynamic Assessment Model for Teaching and Learning Accounting. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 141-153.

Kwon, S. Y. (2006). The comparative effect of individually- generated vs. collaboratively-generated computer-based concept mapping on science concept learning. Yayinlanmamis doktora tezi, Texas A&M University, Texas.

Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52(2), 365-375.

Lin, C. P., Wong, L. H., & Shao, Y. J. (2012). Comparison of 1: 1 and 1: m CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 99-113.

Lin, Y. T., Chang, C. H., Hou, H. T., & Wu, K. C. (2015). Exploring the effects of employing Google Docs in collaborative concept mapping on achievement, concept representation, and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, (ahead-of-print), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1041398 (Erisim Tarihi: 22.10.2015)

Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students’ English reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 54(2), 436-445.

Maleki, M., & Dabbaghi, A. (2014). The influences of concept mapping strategy on reading comprehension of those students challenging in studying invalid books at some high schools. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Research, 3 (1), 44-54.

Mun, K., Kim, J., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2014). Exploration of High School Students’ Concepts About Climate Change Through the Use of an Issue Concept Map (IC-Map). In International Conference on Science Education 2012 Proceedings, 209-222. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of research in science teaching, 27(10), 937-949.

Novak, J. D. (1993). How do we learn our lesson?. The Science Teacher, 60, 50-55.

Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.

Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. . Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC), Technical Report IHMC CmapTools, http://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/theory-of-concept-maps (Erisim Tarihi: 21.10.2015)

Novak, J. D.ve Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oliver, K. (2008). A Comparison of Web-Based Concept Mapping Tasks for Alternative Assessment in Distance Teacher Education. Journal of Computing In Teacher Education, 24(3), 95-103.

Oner, F. ve Arslan, M. (2005). Ilkogretim 6. sinif fen bilgisi dersi elektrik unitesinde kavram haritalari ile ogretimin ogrenme duzeyine etkisi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 163-169.

Qarareh, A. O. (2010). The effect of using concept mapping in teaching on the achievement of fifth graders in science. Stud Home Comm Sci, 4(3), 155-160.

Rao, M. P. (2004). Effect of concept-mapping in science on science achievement, cognitive skills and attitude of students. International Conference to Review Research on Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (epiSTEME-1), (2), 130-131.

Sahin, A., Aydin, G., & Sahin, E. (2009). Effect of the computer-based concept maps on comprehension of the listened text and retention. European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(2), 109-115.

Sahin, F. (2002). Kavram Haritalarinin Degerlendirme Araci Olarak Kullanilmasi Ile Ilgili Bir Arastirma. Pamukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 11(1): 18-33.

Schaal, S., Bogner, F. X., & Girwidz, R. (2010). Concept mapping assessment of media assisted learning in interdisciplinary science education. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 339-352.

Sen, A. I. & Aykutlu, I. (2008). Using concept maps as an alternative evaluation tool for students’ conceptions of electric current. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 31, 75-92.

Snead, D. & Young, B. (2003). Using concept mapping to aid African American students’ understanding in middle grade science. Journal of Negro Education, 72(3), 333-343.

Soika, K. & Reiska, P. (2014). Using Concept Mapping For Assessment in Science Education. Journal Of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 662-673.

Tavsancil, E. (2005). Tutumlarin olculmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.

Temelli, A., Arli, E. E., Biber, B. & Kurt, M. (2011). “Insanlarda Solunum Sistemi Konusunun Kavram Haritalariyla Ogretilmesinin Ogrencilerin Akademik Basarisina Etkisi.” Igdir Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi, 1(2), 61-66.

Temelli, A., Cakmak, M., & Seyhan, B. C. (2011). Ic salgi bezlerimiz konusunda uygulanan kavram haritalarinin ogrencilerin akademik basarisina etkisi. Dicle Universitesi Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 17 (2011), 146-159.

Tseng, H. C., Chou, F. H., Wang, H. H., Ko, H. K., Jian, S. Y., & Weng, W. C. (2011). The effectiveness of problem-based learning and concept mapping among Taiwanese registered nursing students. Nurse education today, 31(8), 41-46.

Tutgun Unal, A. & Arslan, A. (2013). Devlet ve vakif universiteleri egitim fakultesi ogrencilerinin cep telefonu kullanim sikliklarinin ve marka tercihlerinin karsilastirilmasi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 1-19.

Yilmaz, H., Akandere, O., & Korkmaz, I. (2010). Ilkogretim birinci kademe 5. sinif Sosyal Bilgiler dersinde kavram haritalarinin kullanilmasinin basariya olan etkisi. Selcuk Universitesi Ahmet Kelesoglu Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 29, 19-27.

Yilmaz, K., & Colak, R. (2012). Sosyal Bilgiler Ogretiminde Kavram Haritalari Kullaniminin Ogrencilerin Tutum, Akademik Basari ve Bilgilerinin Kalicilik Duzeylerine Etkisi. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 1(1), 1-9.

Yilmaz, O., Tekkaya, C. & Geban, O. (1998). Lise-1. Sinif Ogrencilerinin “Hucre Bolunmesi” Unitesindeki Kavram Yanilgilarinin Tespiti ve Giderilmesi”, III. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Egitimi Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabi, 187-191, Karadeniz Teknik Universitesi, Trabzon.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-13

How to Cite

Çömek, A., Akınoğlu, O., Elmacı, E., & Gündoğdu, T. (2016). The effect of concept mapping on students’ academic achievement and attitude in science education&lt;p&gt;Fen eğitiminde kavram haritaları kullanımının akademik başarı ve tutuma etkisi. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 348–363. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3558

Issue

Section

Education