Use of digital books at academic level: Perceptions, attitudes and preferences of post-graduate students

Authors

  • Aras Bozkurt Anadolu University
  • Muhammet Recep Okur Anadolu University
  • Abdulkadir Karadeniz Anadolu University

Keywords:

Digital books, e-books, interactive e-books, post-graduate students, e-reading experience

Abstract

Though first appeared in 1971, digital book technology has evolved especially since 2000s and it is relatively a new research area. Therefore, to better understand this phenomenon, a quantitative survey research was conducted in 2015 spring term in a state university in Turkey. The objective of the study is to explain current state of digital books within post-graduate students’ perspectives and to identify post-graduate student’s perceptions, attitudes and preferences related to digital books. In this regard, this research presents results of the survey. A total of 135 post-graduate students responded the questionnaire. The data regarding use of digital books in addition to demographics was collected through an online questionnaire and the findings were analyzed through descriptive statistics. In this sense, post-graduate students’ use of digital books, purposes to use, preferred devices, and most used features of digital books were examined. In addition to these questions, reasons not to use digital books and post-graduate students’ future attitude whether to use digital books or not were further investigated. Additionally, research directions for future implications were provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Aras Bozkurt, Anadolu University

Ph.D.c, Institute of Social Sciences, Distance Education Department. Anadolu University

Muhammet Recep Okur, Anadolu University

Ph.D., Open Education faculty, Anadolu University

Abdulkadir Karadeniz, Anadolu University

Ph.D.c, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu University

References

Atkins, M. (2014). Foreword. In: Woodward, H. (ed.) Ebooks in Education: Realising the Vision. Pp. v-vi. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bal.for

Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates' information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), 518-525.

Borchers, J.O. (1999). Electronic Books: Definition, genres, interaction design patterns. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI99 Workshop: Designing Electronic Books. Pittsburgh.

Bozkurt, A. (2013). Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmeye Yönelik Etkileşimli E-kitap Değerlendirme Kriterlerinin Belirlenmesi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Uzaktan Eğitim Anabilim Dalı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Eskişehir. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/3802974/Acik_ve_Uzaktan_Ogrenmeye_Yonelik_Etkilesimli_E-kitap_Degerlendirme_Kriterlerinin_Belirlenmesi

Bozkurt, A., & Bozkaya, M. (2013a). Bir Öğrenme Malzemesi Olarak Etkileşimli E-Kitap Hazırlama Adımları. Eğitimde Politika Analizi, 2(2), 8-20.

Bozkurt, A., & Bozkaya, M. (2013b). Etkileşimli e-kitap Değerlendirme Kriterleri. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/6007097/Etkileşimli_e-kitap_Değerlendirme_Kriterleri

Bozkurt, A., & Bozkaya, M. (2013c). Etkileşimli E-Kitap: Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını. Akademik Bilişim 2013. (s.375-381). Akdeniz Üniversitesi, 23-25 Ocak, Antalya. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/2536903/Etkilesimli_E-Kitap_Dunu_Bugunu_ve_Yarini

Bozkurt, A., & Bozkaya, M. (2015). Evaluation Criteria for Interactive E-Books for Open and Distance Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 58-82. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2218/3409

Burk, R. (2001). E-book devices and the marketplace: in search of customers. Library hi tech, 19(4), 325-331.

CILIP (2012). Ebook Acquisition and Lending Briefing. Public, Academic and Research Libraries. CILIP, Policy Department, August 2012 (revised September 2012). Retrieved from http://www.cilip.org.uk/getinvolved/policy/statements%20and%20briefings/Documents/Ebook%20acquisition%20and%20lending%20by%20libraries%20-%20longer%20briefingv2.pdf

Clay, J. (2012) Preparing for Effective Adoption and Use of Ebooks in Education. Other. UKOLN, University of Bath.

Cox, A., Ormes, S., Mohammed, H., & Kerr, M. (2001). E-books. Library & information briefings, (96), 1-14.

Guardian (2012). Huge rise in ebook sales offsets decline in printed titles. A Guardian website article of 2 May. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/may/02/rise-ebook-sales-decline-print-titles

Hart, M. (1992). The History and Philosophy of Project Gutenberg by Michael Hart. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:The_History_and_Philosophy_of_Project_Gutenberg_by_Michael_Hart

Hart, M. (2004). Gutenberg Mission Statement by Michael Hart. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:Project_Gutenberg_Mission_Statement_by_Michael_Hart

Holzinger, A., Baernthaler, M., Pammer, W., Katz, H., Bjelic-Radisic, V., & Ziefle, M. (2011). Investigating paper vs. screen in real-life hospital workflows: Performance contradicts perceived superiority of paper in the user experience.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(9), 563-570.

Itzkovitch, A. (2012). Interactive eBook Apps: The reinvention of reading and interactivity, UXMAGAZINE, article no: 816, http://uxmag.com/articles/interactive-ebook-apps-the-reinvention-of-reading-and-interactivity

Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2009, January). Scholarly e-books: the views of 16,000 academics: Results from the JISC National E-Book Observatory. In Aslib Proceedings (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 33-47). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2009, January). Scholarly e-books: the views of 16,000 academics: Results from the JISC National E-Book Observatory. In Aslib Proceedings (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 33-47). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

McKiel, A. W. (2008). 2008 Global Student E-book Survey. Ebrary. United Kingdom.

McKiel, A. W. (2011). 2011 Global Student E-book Survey. Ebrary. United Kingdom.

Nelson, M. R. (2008). E-books in higher education: nearing the end of the era of hype?. Educause Review, 43(2), 40.

Ongoz, S., & Baki, A. (2010). E-book usage of graduate students studying educational sciences in Turkiye. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(1).

Ramaiah, C. K., Foo, S., & Choo, H. P. (2006). Trends in electronic publishing. In eLearning and digital publishing (pp. 111-131). Springer Netherlands.

Rao, S. S. (2003). Electronic books: a review and evaluation. Library Hi Tech, 21(1), 85-93.

Tucker, J. C., & Sinha, R. (2008). Moving from book to e-book. The Acquisitions Librarian, 19(3 & 4), 353.

Vassiliou, M., & Rowley, J. (2008). Progressing the definition of “e-book”.Library Hi Tech, 26(3), 355-368.

Wishenbard, R. (2014). Global eBook: A report on market trends and developments. Update spring 2014. Retrieved from http://www.wischenbart.com/upload/1234000000358_04042014_final.pdf

Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945-948.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-01

How to Cite

Bozkurt, A., Okur, M. R., & Karadeniz, A. (2016). Use of digital books at academic level: Perceptions, attitudes and preferences of post-graduate students. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 663–673. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3534

Issue

Section

Education