Choice of address terms in conversational setting

Authors

  • Fatma Hülya Özcan Anadolu University

Keywords:

Addressing, address terms, kinship terms, first names, positive terms, negative terms

Abstract

A choice of an address term signals the relationship between language and society and how a person imagines his/her relationship with the addressee within this society. Address terms, therefore, provides sociolinguistic information about the interlocutors as well as pragmatic aspect of the situation. Previous research have focused on the effect of power and solidarity in the choice of address terms. This study, on the other hand, focuses on the address terms used during spontaneous conversation taking place in a no-power situation. The primary concern of the study is to identify the potential effects of a bilingual situation and a different culture. This study investigated the address terms school children use in a reciprocal situation, which are further analyzed regarding the potential effect of age, gender and being monolingual or bilingual in this issue. For this purpose, the group conversations of 56 monolingual Turkish speaking and 48 monolingual Turkish-Danish speaking children were analyzed. The address terms are coded and classified as emerged from the data. The results have shown that monolingual children use a great variety of address terms while bilingual children dwell on first names more frequently. Choice of address forms are governed by politeness, and positive and negative face. The results will lead to awareness-raising on pragmatic aspects of conversations and social relationship and will have implications on educational context especially in bilingual settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Fatma Hülya Özcan, Anadolu University

Associate Prof. Dr. at the Department of Foreign Language Education

References

Afful, Joseph Benjamin Archibald (2006). ‘Address Terms Among University Students In Ghana: A Case Study’. Language and Intercultural Communication 6(1): 76–91.

Gisle, A. & K. Aijmer (2011) Pragmatics of society. Volume 5, Handbooks of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman (1960). ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’. In Thomas Sebeoki (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: 253–276.

Dickey, Eleanor (1997). ‘Forms of Address And Terms of Reference’. Journal of Linguistics, 33, 255-274.

Fasold, Ralph (1990). The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Lamber, Wallace & Richard Tucker (1976). Tù, Vous, Used: A Social Psychological Study of Address Patterns. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Leech, Geoffrey (1999): ‘The Distribution and Function of Vocatives in American and British English Conversation’. in Hilde Hasselgard & Signe Oksefjell, (eds.): Out of Corpora. Studies in Honor of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: 107-¬118.

Oyetade, Solomon Oluwale (1995). ‘A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Address Forms in Yoruba’. Language in Society 24: 515–535.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-22

How to Cite

Özcan, F. H. (2016). Choice of address terms in conversational setting. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 982–1002. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3489

Issue

Section

Linguistic