The adaptation of psychological climate scale into Turkish: the study of validity and reliability<p>Psikolojik iklim ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Authors

  • Türkan Argon Abant İzzet Baysal University
  • İbrahim Li̇mon

Keywords:

Adaptation, psychological climate, validity, reliability, Uyarlama, psikolojik iklim, geçerlik, güvenirlik

Abstract

In this study it was aimed to adapt Psychological Climate Scale (Brown & Leigh, 1996) into Turkish.  It was originally developed for business organizations but while adapting it into Turkish the items were adjusted to educational settings.     There were 745 teachers in two different study groups.  To test the language validity of the scale, Pearson Correlation coefficient between English and Turkish versions was calculated.  They were responded by English teachers with a two week interval.  Findings indicated a high correlation (r=,859; p<,01) which means that Turkish version has language validity.  Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted to test the construct validity.  Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients were an indication of reliability which was calculated separately for the scale and sub-dimensions (ranges from α= ,912 to α= ,738).  In item analysis, item total correlations and the correlations among sub-dimensions of the scale were calculated.  Additionally, significance of difference between lower and upper 27 % groups was checked. The findings of EFA manifested a construct with five sub dimesions which was different from original scale and this dimensions were named in Turkish based on the original scale.  On the other hand, ‘Challenge’ sub dimension did not meet reliability criteria.  Therefore, it was taken out from adapted version.  The item total correlations met the criteria in the literature.  The difference between lower-upper 27 % groups was statistically significant.  The total scale and its sub-dimensions had also statistically significant correlations (ranging from ,879 to ,455) indicating internal consistency.  The model was validated by CFA. The findings of this study showed that Turkish version of Psychological Climate Scale has validity and reliability which means the scale can be applied in educational organizations.  

Extended English abstract is in the end of PDF (TURKISH) file.

 

Özet

Bu çalışma ile İngilizce Psikolojik İklim Ölçeğinin (Brown & Leigh, 1996) Türkçe’ye uyarlanması amaçlanmıştır.  Ölçeğin orijinali iş örgütleri için geliştirilmiş olmakla birlikte, uyarlama esnasında maddeler eğitim örgütlerine uygun hale getirilmiştir.  Araştırma iki farklı çalışma grubu üzerinde yürütülmüş olup; bu gruplar toplam 745 öğretmenden oluşmaktadır.  Ölçeğin dil yönünden geçerliğini doğrulamak amacıyla İngilizce ve Türkçe versiyonlar iki hafta ara ile İngilizce öğretmenlerinden oluşan bir gruba uygulanarak; bu ölçümler arasındaki Pearson Korelasyon katsayısı hesaplanmıştır.  Elde edilen bulgu ölçümler arasında yüksek düzeyli bir ilişkinin mevcudiyetini ifade etmektedir (r=,859; p<,01) ki bu da ölçeğin Türkçe versiyonun dil yönünden geçerli olduğunu kanıtlamaktadır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini belirlemek amacıyla ise Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yürütülmüştür. Ölçeğin geneli ve alt boyutları için ayrı ayrı hesaplanan Cronbach’s Alpha katsayısıları güvenirliği işaret etmektedir (α= ,912- α= ,738 arasında).  Madde analizi bağlamında, madde toplam korelasyonları, ölçeğin alt boyutları arasındaki ilişkiler ve alt-üst % 27’lik gruplar arasındaki farkın anlamlılığı ortaya konmuştur. AFA’dan elde edilen sonuçlar orijinal ölçekten farklı olarak beş boyutlu bir yapıya işaret etmektedir.  Bu boyutlar ölçeğin İngilizce versiyonuna sadık kalınarak Türkçe’ye çevrilmiştir.  Diğer taraftan, ‘Mesleki Zorluk’ alt boyutu gerekli güvenirlik kriterini sağlayamadığı için ölçeğin Türkçe versiyonunda yer almamaktadır.  Madde toplam korelasyonları alan yazında ortaya konan ölçütleri karşılamıştır.  Alt-üst % 27’lik gruplar arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır.  Ölçek geneli ve alt boyutları arasındaki istatiksel açıdan anlamlı ilişkiler iç tutarlılığın göstergesidir (,879-,455).  Modelin geçerliliği DFA ile doğrulanmıştır.  Çalışma sonucunda Psikolojik İklim Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlandığında geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu görülmüştür. Bu bağlamda, söz konusu ölçme aracı eğitim örgütlerinde uygulanabilir.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Türkan Argon, Abant İzzet Baysal University

Prof. Dr., Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü

İbrahim Li̇mon

Doktora Öğrencisi, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü

References

Altunköse, T. N. (2002). Psikolojik İklimin Örgüte Adama ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ile İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Eskişehir.

Amenumey, E. K., & Lockwood, A. (2008). Psychological Climate and Psychological Empowerment: An Exploration in a Luxury UK Hotel Group. Tourism and Hospitality Research , 8 (4), 265-282.

Barkhi, R., & Kao, Y.-C. (2011). Psychological climate and decision-making performance in a GDSS contex. Information & Management , 48, 125-134.

Biswas, S. (2011). Psychological Climate and Affective commitment as Antecedents of Sales Persons' Level of Job Performance. Managemeny Insight , 7 (2), 1-8.

Biswas, S. (2010). Relationship between psychological climate and turnover intentions and its impact on organisational effectiveness: A study in Indian organisations. IIMB Management Review , 22, 102-110.

Biswas, S., & Varma, A. (2007). Psychological climate and individual performance in India: test of a mediated model. Employee Relations , 29 (6), 664-676.

Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A New Look at Psychological Climate and Its Relationship to Job Involvement, Effort, and Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology , 81 (4), 358-368.

Burke, M. I., Borucki, C. C., & Hurley, A. E. (1992). Reconceptualizing Psychological Climate in a Retail Service Environment:A Multiple-Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology , 77 (5), 717-729.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.

Byrne, Z. S., Stoner, J., Thompson, K. R., & Hochwarter, W. (2005). The interactive effects of conscientiousness,work effort, and psychological climate on job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 66, 326-338.

Carless, S. A. (2004). Does Psychological Empowerment Mediate The Relationship Between Psychological Climate and Job Satisfaction? Journal of Business and Psychology , 18 (4), 405-425.

Day, D. V., & Bedeian, A. G. (1991). Predicting job performance across organizations: The interaction of work orientation and psychological climate. Journal of Management , 17 (3), 589-600.

Evans, J. (1996). Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

Fitzpatrick, T. A. (2008). The Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Psychological Climate Among Community Banking Employees.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersy: Prentice Hall.

Hassan, M. U. (2012). The Relationship between Person Organization Fit, Person-Job-Fit and Turnover Intention in Banking Sector of Pakistan: The Mediating Role of Psychological Climate. International Journal of Human Resource Studies , 2 (3), 172-188.

Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and Procedures in Adopting Structural Equation Modelin Technique. Journal of Quantitative Applied Methods (1), 76-83.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods , 6 (1), 53-60.

Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis:Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , 6 (1), 1-55.

Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading Statistics and Research. Boston: Pearson.

James, L. R., & Sells, S. B. (1981). Psychological Climate: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Research. D. Magnusson içinde, Toward A Psychology of Situations: An Interactional Perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

James, L. R., Choi, C. C., Ko, C.-H. E., MCNeil, P. K., Minton, M. K., Wright, M. A., et al. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate:A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 17 (1), 5-32.

James, L. R., Hartman, A., Stebbins, M. W., & Jones, A. P. (1977). Relationship Between Psychological Climate and A Vie Model For Work Motivation. Personnel Psychology , 30, 229-254.

Kettinger, W. J., Li, Y., Davis, J. M., & Kettinger, L. (2015). The roles of psychological climate, information management capabilities, and IT support on knowledge-sharing: an MOA perspective. European Journal of Information Systems , 24, 59-75.

Kline, R. B. (2009). Becoming A Behavioral Science Researcher: A Guide to Producing Research That Matter. New York: The Guilford Press.

Kline, R. B. (2013). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Y. Petscher, & C. Schatsschneider içinde, Applied quantitative analysis in the social sciences (s. 171-207). New York: Routledge.

Koys, D. J., & DeCotiis, T. A. (1991). Inductive Measures of Psychological Climate. 44 (3), 265-285.

Manning, R. L. (2010). Development of the Psychological Climate Scale for Small Business. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends , 8 (1), 50-65.

Martin, A. J., Jones, E. S., & Callan, V. J. (2005). The role of psychological climate in facilitating employee adjustment during organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 14 (3), 263-289.

O'Neill, B., & Arendt, L. A. (2008). Psychological Climate and Work Attitudes: The Importance of Telling the Right Story. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies , 14 (4), 353-370.

Othman, N. B., Hussein, H. B., Salleh, S. B., & Wahid, H. B. (2014). Resilience Scale: Exploration of Items Validity and Reliability. The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, (s. 24-33). Bali.

Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altman, R. A., Lacost, H. A., et al. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 24, 389-416.

Russo, R. (2003). Statistics for Behavioural Sciences. Sussex: Psychology Press.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models:Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online , 8 (2), 23-74.

Schyns, B., Veldhoven, M. v., & Wood, S. (2009). Organizational climate,relative psychological climate and job satisfaction: The example of supportive leadership climate. Leadership & Organization Development Journal , 30 (7).

Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Lumpkin, J. R. (1993). The influence of psychological climate on conflict resolution strategies in franchise relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 21 (3), 207-215.

Thayer, S. F. (2008). Psychological Climate and Its Relationship to Employee Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour.

Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis:Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology , 9 (2), 79-94.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-27

How to Cite

Argon, T., & Li̇mon İbrahim. (2017). The adaptation of psychological climate scale into Turkish: the study of validity and reliability&lt;p&gt;Psikolojik iklim ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2888–2901. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/4614

Issue

Section

Educational Administration and Management