The examınatıon of gender effect on luxury value perceptıon: Istanbul cıty example<p>Cinsiyetin lüks değer algısı üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi: İstanbul ili örneği

Authors

  • Nihal Sütütemiz Sakarya University
  • Aysel Kurnaz Sakarya University

Keywords:

Luxury, Luxury Value, Luxury Value Perception, Gender, Istanbul, Lüks, Lüks Değer, Lüks Değer Algısı, Cinsiyet, İstanbul

Abstract

In this research it was aimed to determine consumers’ perception towards luxury value by gender factor and to reveal if gender has an influence on these perceptions. In this context, İstanbul city, which represents Turkish consumers in a general way, was chosen as the universe of this research and 1100 people who are above 18 years of age were chosen as the sample by using gender filter. Data was gathered from the sample with survey method and exploratory factor analysis was implemented on the data. After the literature review it was seen that there are four main dimensions that constitue luxury perception which are financial, functional, personal and social. Findings of this study are in accordance with the existing literature. Moreover, relative importance of the dimensions differ based on gender in financial and functional dimensions. It was found that social value is relatively the most important dimension for female participants’ luxury value perception where personal value is the most important dimension for male participants.

 

Özet

Bu çalışmada, tüketicilerin lüks değere yönelik algıları cinsiyet unsuru açısından belirlenmeye çalışılarak, cinsiyetin bu algılara etkisinin olup olmadığı ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu bağlamda, özellikle lüks tüketim açısından Türk tüketicisini genel olarak temsil eden İstanbul ili ana kütle olarak belirlenmiş ve cinsiyet kotası kullanılarak 18 yaş ve üzeri 1100 kişi örneklem olarak seçilmiştir.  Söz konusu örneklemden veriler,  anket yöntemiyle elde edilmiş ve verilere keşfedici (exploratory) faktör analizi uygulanmıştır.  Yazında lüks algısının oluşmasında finansal, fonksiyonel, kişisel ve sosyal olmak üzere dört temel değer boyutu tespit edilmiştir.  Bu çalışmanın bulguları da yazındaki bulgulara benzerlik göstermekle birlikte, boyutların görece önemi ilk iki boyut itibariyle cinsiyet açısından farklılık göstermiştir. Kadın tüketicilerin lüks değer algısında sosyal değer görece en önemli iken, erkek tüketiciler için ise kişisel değer en önemli boyut olarak bulunmuştur.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Nihal Sütütemiz, Sakarya University

Assoc. Prof. Dr., Sakarya University, Faculty of Management, Department of Production Management and Marketing

Aysel Kurnaz, Sakarya University

Ph.D. Student, Sakarya University, Institute of Social Sciences

References

Altunışık, Remzi, Coşkun Recai, Bayraktaroğlu Serkan, Yıldırım Engin (2007). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, SPSS Uygulamalı. 5. Baskı. Sakarya Yayıncılık. Adapazarı.

Bain and Co Raporu (2006), 2016 İlkbahar Küresel Lüks Tüketim Malları. http://www.sondakika.com/haber/haber-2020-ye-kadar-50-milyon-tuketici-luks-agina-8663340/, (02/08/2016).

Bayram, N. (2009). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS İle Veri Analizi. 2. Baskı. Ezgi Kitabevi. Bursa.

Berry, Christopher J. (1994). The Idea Of Luxury. A Conceptual And Historical Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berthon P, Pitt L, Parent M. And Berthon J-P. (2009). ‘Aesthetics And Ephemerality: Observing And Preserving The Luxury Brand’. California Management Review. 52(1): 45–66.

Bocock, R. (2005). Tüketim. (2. Baskı) Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.

Brun, A. and Castelli, C. (2013). ‘The Nature Of Luxury: A Consumer Perspective’. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. Vol. 41 No. 11/12: 823-847.

Cornell, A. (2002). ‘Cult Of Luxury: The New Opiate Of The Masses’. Australian Financial Review. 27th April: 47.

Danziger, P.N., (2005). Let Them Eat Cake: Marketing Luxury To The Masses – As Well As The Classes. Dearborn Trading Publishing. NewYork, USA.

Dubois, B. and Paternault, C. (1995). ‘Observations – Understanding The World Of İnternational Luxury Brands: The Dream Formula’. Journal of Advertising Research. Vol. 35 No. 4: 69-76.

Dubois B., Czellar S. And Laurent Gilles. (2005). ‘Consumer Segments Based On Attitudes Toward Luxuury: Empirical Evidence From Twenty Countries’. Mark Lett. 16 (2):115–28.

Gutman, J. (1982). ‘A Means-end Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processess’. Journal of Marketing. Vol:56, Spring: 60-72.

Hanna, J. (2004). Luxury İsn’t What İt Used To Be. HBS Working Knowledge. August.

Hair, J. F. Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tahtam and W. J. Black (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Beşinci Baskı. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Hennigs, N. et al (2012). ‘What Is the Value of Luxury? A Cross-Cultural Consumer Perspective’. Psychology and Marketing. Vol.29 (12): 1018-1034.

Kapferer, J.-N. (1997). ‘Managing Luxury Brands’. Journal of Brand Management. 4, 251–260.

Kapferer, J-N. And Bastien V. (2009). The Luxury Strategy: Break The Rules Of Marketing To Build Luxury Brands. London: Kogan Page Ltd.; 2009.

Malhotra, N. (1996), Marketing Research-An Applied Orientation. Second Edition. Prentice Hall International.

Meyers-Levy, J. (1988). ‘The Influence Of Sex Roles On Judgment’. Journal of Consumer Research. 14(4): 522–30.

Nwankwo, S., Hamelin, N. and Khaled, M. (2014). ‘Consumer Values, Motivation And Purchase Intention For Luxury Goods’. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 21: 735–744.

Nueno, J.L. and Quelch, J.A. (1998). ‘The Mass Marketing Of Luxury’. Business Horizons. Vol. 41 No. 6: 61-68.

Okonkwo, U. (2007). Luxury Fashion Branding: Trends, Tactics, Techniques. Palgrave Macmillan. New York, NY.

Okonkwo, U. (2009). ‘The Luxury Brand Strategy Challenge’. Journal of Brand Management. Vol. 16 No 5/6: 287-289.

Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill

Oxford Latin Dictionary. (1992). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Phau, I. ve Prendergast, G. (2000). ‘Consuming Luxury Brands: The Relevance Of The ‘Rarity Principle’. Journal of Brand Management. Vol. 8 No. 2: 122-137.

Prakash, V. (1992). ‘Sex Roles And Advertising Preferences’. Journal of Advertising Research. 32(3):43–52.

Ryan, F. (2009). ‘Technology Will Boost Consumers’ Global Power’. Caribbean Business. Vol. 37 No. 9: 38-40.

Sari, D. and Kusuma, B. (2014). ‘Does Luxury Brand Perception Matter In Purchase Intention? A Comparison Between A Japanese Brand And A German Brand’. Asean Marketıng Journal. June 2014 - Vol.VI - No. 50-62.

Shukla, P. (2012). ‘The Influence Of Value Perceptions On Luxury Purchase Intentions in Developed And Emerging Markets’. Int. Market. Rev.29(6): 574–596.

Shukla, P. and Purani, K. (2012). ‘Comparing The İmportance Of Luxury Value Perceptions in Cross-National Contexts’. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 65 No. 10: 1417-1424.

Smith, J.B. and Colgate, M. (2007). ‘Customer Value Creation: A Practical Framework’. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. Vol. 15 No. 1: 7-23.

Sombart, W. (2013). Aşk, Lüks ve Kapitalizm. Ankara: Pharmakon.

Stokburger-Sauer, N.E. and Teichmann, K. (2013). ‘Is Luxury Just A Female Thing? The Role Of Gender in Luxury Brand Consumption’. Journal of Business Research. 66: 889–896.

Sweeney, J.C. and Soutar, G.N. (2001). ‘Consumer Perceived Value: The Development Of A Multiple Item Scale’. Journal of Retailing. vol. 77, no. 2: 203-220.

Şengüder, T. (2000), An Examination of Personal and Cultural Values Between Turkish and America Consumers Concerning Cross-National Customer Satisfaction Judgement. Nova Southeastern University. Phd. Dissertation. UMİ.

The Boston Consulting Group Raporu (2014). Lüks Tüketimin Değişen Dinamikleri, http://www.sondakika.com/haber/haber-bcg-kuresel-luks-tuketim-pazari-2-trilyon-dolara-5873160/ (15.06.2016).

Truong, Y., Simmons Geoff, McColl Rodd, Kitchen Philip J. (2008). ‘Status and Conspicuousness — Are They Related? Strategic Marketing Implications For Luxury Brands’. J Strat Mark. 16(3):189–203.

Tsai, S. (2005), ‘Impact Of Personal Orientation On Luxury Brand Purchase Value: An International Investigation’. International Journal of Market Research. Vol. 47 No. 4: 429-454.

Vickers, Jonathan S. and Renand Franck. (2003). ‘The Marketing Of Luxury Goods: An Exploratory Study — Three Conceptual Dimensions’. Market Rev. 3(4): 459–78 4.

Vigneron, F., and Johnson, L.W. (1999). ‘A Review And A Conceptual Framework Of Prestige-Seeking Consumer Behavior’. Academy of Marketing Science Review. 1. 1–15.

Vigneron, F., and Johnson, L. W. (2004). ‘Measuring Perceptions Of Brand Luxury’. Journal of Brand Management. 11. 484– 506.

Wiedmann, K.-P., Hennigs, N., and Siebels, A. (2007). ‘Measuring Consumers’ Luxury Value Perception: A Cross-Cultural Framework’. Academy of Marketing Science Review. 7. 1–21.

Wiedmann, K.-P., Hennigs, N., and Siebels, A. (2009). ‘Value Based Segmentation Of Luxury Consumption Behavior’. Psychology and Marketing. 26. 625–651.

Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1988). ‘Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence’. Journal of Marketing. 52(July). 2–22.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-05

How to Cite

Sütütemiz, N., & Kurnaz, A. (2016). The examınatıon of gender effect on luxury value perceptıon: Istanbul cıty example&lt;p&gt;Cinsiyetin lüks değer algısı üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi: İstanbul ili örneği. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 4432–4445. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/4059

Issue

Section

Marketing