Some variables predicting five factor personality of adolescents<p>Ergenlerin beş faktör kişilik özelliğini yordayan bazı değişkenler

Authors

  • Mehmet Bilgin Çukurova University

Keywords:

Adolesents, Five Factor Personality, Cognitive Error, Cognitive Flexibility, Social Self-Efficacy, Ergen, Beş Kişilik, Bilişsel Esneklik, Bilişsel Hata, Sosyal Yetkinlik

Abstract

In this study, variables predicting the five-factor personality traits of adolescents were examined. These variables are cognitive flexibility, social self-efficacy, and cognitive errors. Research on middle and high school students from 7th.8th.9th.10th.11th.and 12th grades, a total of 441 students, participated to the study. In the study, the Five Factor Personality Inventory, Social Self Efficacy Scale, Cognitive Flexibility Scale and Cognitive Errors Questionnaire were used. The findings of the study show that significant predictied variables for five personality traits are cognitive flexibility, social self-efficacy and cognitive errors. As a result, positive relationship between social self-efficacy and extraversion, aggreeablesness, and openness to experiences personality traits were emerged. It was determined that there was a positive relationship between self-control personality traits and cognitive flexibility, and a negative relationship cognitive flexibility with neuroticism. However, results showed that over-generalization error was commonly used by people who had self-control and neuroticism personality traits. Self-control and agreeablesness of the personality traits were used at the same time personalization errors.  It is determined that only individuals with agreeablesness trait seemed to made error of selective abstraction. Overall, It is seen that people who are cognitive flexibility are extraversion, agreeablesness, self-control and openness to experiences personality traits. 

 

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ergenlerin beş faktör kişilik özelliklerini yordayan değişkenler incelenmeye çalışılmıştır.  Bu değişkenler bilişsel esneklik, sosyal yetkinlik ve bilişsel hatalardır. Araştırmaya 7.8.9.10.11.ve 12 sınıf öğrencileri olmak üzere toplam 441 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmada beş faktör kişilik envanteri, bilişsel esneklik ölçeği, bilişsel hatalar ölçeği ve sosyal yetkinlik beklentisi ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonunda elde edilen bulgular, beş faktör kişilik özelliklerine anlamlı olarak etkiedendeğişkenlerin, bilişsel esneklik, bilişsel hatalar ve sosyal yetkinlik beklentisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, dışadönüklük, yumuşakbaşlılık, ve gelişime açıklık kişilik özellikleri ile sosyal yetkinlik arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir. Bilişsel esneklik ile özdenetim kişilik özelliği arasında pozitif, nevrotizm ile negatif bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte aşırı genelleme hatasının özdenetim ve nevrotizm kişilik özelliklerine sahip kişiler tarafından daha çok kullanıldığı, özdenetim kişilik özelliğine sahip kişilerin ve yumuşakbaşlılık kişilik özelliğine sahip kişilerin aynı zamanda kişiselleştirme hatalarını da kullandıkları saptanmıştır. Sadece yumuşakbaşlılık kişilik özelliğine sahip bireylerin seçici soyutlama hatasını yaptıkları belirlenmiştir.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Mehmet Bilgin, Çukurova University

Assoc. Prof. Dr., Çukurova University, Faculty of Education, Division of Guidance and Psychological Counseling

References

Akkapulu, E. (2005). Ergenin sosyal yetkinlik beklentisini yordayan bazı değişkenler. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Adana.

Aydın, A. (2010). Ergenlerde sosyal anksiyete belirtilerini azaltmaya yönelik bilişsel-davranışçı bir müdahale programın etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 21 (1), 25-36.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy. Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Pyschological Review. 84,191-215.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thougth and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. 415-416.

Bandura, A., Barbarenelli, C., Cappara, G. V., ve Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifacased impact of self-efficacy belief on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206-1222.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. U.S.A.: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Bandura, A., Pastorelli, C., Barbaranelli, C., ve Caprara, G.V. (1999). Self-efficacy pathwyas to childhood depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 258-269.

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., ve Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187-206.

Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., ve Pastorelli, C. (2003). Impact of affective self-regulatory efficacy on diverse sphere of functioning. Child Development, 74, 1-14.

Beck, A.T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Pres.

Bilgin. M. (1999). Ergenlere yönelik sosyal yetkinlik beklentisi ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2, 12, 7-15.

Bilgin. M. (2009). Developing a Cognitive Flexibility Scale: Validitity and Relaiability Studies. Social Personality and Behavio. 37, 4-10

Blau, S., ve Fuller, J. R. (2006). Rational-emotive disputing and the Five-factor model: Personality dimensions of the Ellis emotional efficiency inventory. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 24 (2), 87-100.

Bretherton, I., Golby., ve Cho, E. (1997). Attachment and the transmission of values. In J.E.Grusec & L., Kuczyski (Ed.), Parenting and children’s internalizaiton of values (pp. 103-134). New York: Wiley.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

Caprara, G. V., Scabini, E., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Regalia, C., ve Bandura, A. (1999). Autoefficacia percepita emotiva e interpersonale e buon funzionamento sociale [Perceived emotional and interpersonal self efficacy and psychosocial well-being].Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 26, 769–789.

Caprara, G.V., Regalia, C., ve Bandura, A. (2002). Longitudinal impact of perceived self- regulatory efficacy on violent conduct. Europen Psychologist, 7, 63-69.

Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Cervone, D., ve Artistico, D. (2003). The contribution of self- efficacy beliefs to dispositional shyness: On social-cognitive systems and the development of personality dispositions. Journal of Personality, 71, 6, 943-970.

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., ve Barbaranelli, C. (2010). Optimal functioning: The contribution of self-efficacy beliefs to positive orientation. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 79, 328–330.

Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., ve Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 78–96.

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., ve Eisenberg, N. (2012). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102, 1289-1303.

Caprara, G., Vecchione, M., Barbaranelli, C., ve Alessandri, G. (2013). Emotional stability and affective self-regulatory efficacy beliefs: Proofs of integration between trait theory and social cognitive theory. European Journal of Personality. 27, 145-154.

Carver, C., Johnson, S.L., McCullough, M. E., Forster, D. E. ve Joormann, J. (2014). Adulthood personality correlates of chilhood adversity. Frontiers in Psychology. 5,1-8.

Connoly, J. (1989). Social self-efficacy in adolescence; Relations with self-concept, social adjustment, and mental health. Canadian Journal of Behavior Science Review, 21, 3, 258-269.

Corcoran, K, O., ve Mallinckrodt, B. (2000). Adult attachment, self-efficacy, perspective taking, and conflict resolution. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 4, 473-484.

Davies, M.F. (2006). Irrational beliefs and unconditional self-acceptance. I. Correlational evidence linking two key features of REBT. Journal Of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 24 (2), 113-124.

De Wolff, J., ve IJzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68, 571-591.

Di Tommaso, E., Brannen-McNulty, C., Ross, L., ve Burges, M. (2002). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 35,2, 303-312.

Doyle, A.B., Markiewicz, D., ve Hardy, C. (1994). Mother’s and children’s freindship: Intergenerational associations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 363-377.

Gresham, F. M. (1984). Social skills and self-efficacy for expectional children. Expectional Children. 51, 3, 253-261.

Homel, R., Burns, A., ve Goodnow, J. (1987). Parental social Networks and child development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 159-177.

Isabella, R A. (1993). Origins of attachment: Maternal interactive behavior across the first year. Child Development, 64, 605-621.

John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., ve Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkley, CA: University of California. Berkley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., ve Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp.114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Leitenberg, H., Yost, L. W., ve Caroll-Wilson M. (1986). Negative cognitive errors in children: Questionnaire development, normative data, and comparisons between with and with-out self-reported symptoms of depression, low self-esteem, and evaluation anxiety. Journal of Consult Clinical Pyschology. 55 (4), 528-536.

Martin, M. M., ve Rubin, R. B. (1994). Development of a communication flexibility scale. Southern Communication Journal, 59, 171-178.

Martin, M. M., ve Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76, 623-626.

Martin, M. M., ve Anderson, C.M. (1996). Communication traits: A cross-generational investigation. Communication Research Reports, 13, 58-67.

Martin, M. M., ve Anderson, C. M. (1998). The cognitive Flexibility Scale: Three validity studies. Communicati on Reports, 11, 1-9.

Martin, M.M., Anderson, C. M., ve Thweatt, K. S. (1998). Aggressive communication traits and their relationship with the cognitive flexibility scale and the communication flexibility scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 3, 34-45.

McCrae, R.R., ve Costa, P. T., (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 52 (1), 81- 90.

McCrae, R. R., ve Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford.

Melby, J.N., Conger, R.D., Conger, J.K., ve Lorenz, F.Q. (1993). Effects of parental behavior on tobacco use by young male adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 439-454.

Muris, P. (2006). Maladaptive schemas in non-clinical adolescents: Relations to percieved parental rearing behaviors. Big Five personality factors, and pyschopathological symptoms. Clinical Pyschology and Pyschotherapy, 13, 405-413.

Rice, K.G., FitzGerald, D.P., Whaley, T.J., ve Gibbs, C.L. (1995). Cross-sectional and longitudinal examination of attachment, separation-individuation and college student adjustment. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 463-474.

Robin , A.L., ve Foster, S.L. (1989). Negotiating parent-adolescent conflict: A behavioral family systems approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Sharabany, R. (1994). Intimate friendship scale: Conceptual underpinnings, psychometric properties and construct validity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 11, 449-469.

Sava, F. A.(2009). Maladaptive schemas, irrational beliefs, and their relationship with the five-factor personality model. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Pyschotherapies. 9 (2), september, 135-147.

Somer, O., Korkmaz, M., ve Tatar, A. (2011). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Beş Faköt Kişilik Modeli ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları.

Steinberg, L., Darling, N., Fletcher, A., Brown, B., ve Dornbusch, M. (1995). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment: An ecological journey. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr, & K. Luscher (Ed.), Examining lives in context: Persrectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 423-466). Washington, DC: APA.

Stevenson-Hindle, J., ve Shouldice, A. (1995). Maternal interactions and self-reports related to attachment classifications at 4.5 years. Child Development, 66, 583-596.

Tatar, A., Bildik, T., Saltukoğlu, G., ve Dinçel, M. G. (2014). Klinik olmayan örneklemden beş faktör kişilik envanteri belirti tarama amaçlı kullanılabilir mi?: Ön çalışma. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi. 4 (güz), 181-199.

Vincent-Roehling, P., ve Robin, A.L.(1986). Development and validation of the family beliefs inventory: A measure of unrealistic beliefs among parents and adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 693-697.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-21

How to Cite

Bilgin, M. (2016). Some variables predicting five factor personality of adolescents&lt;p&gt;Ergenlerin beş faktör kişilik özelliğini yordayan bazı değişkenler. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 3654–3670. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3975

Issue

Section

Guidance and Psychological Counselling