Forgiveness Flexibility Scale For Secondary Education: Validity and reliability study<p>Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinde Affetme Esnekliği Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Authors

  • Tuğba Seda Çolak Düzce University
  • Mustafa Koç Sakarya University
  • Halime Eker Ministry of Education
  • Betül Düşünceli Sakarya University

Keywords:

Forgiveness, Forgiveness Flexibility Scale, Validity, Reliability, Affetme, Affetme Esnekliği Ölçeği, Geçerlik, Güvenirlik

Abstract

The aim of the study is to develop a scale which determines forgiveness flexibility level of secondary education students and to test reliability and validity of the scale. The study was actualized with 651 secondary education students. As result of exploratory factor analysis, which was used to test structure validity of the scale, a structure which explains 45.5% variance of total scale was attained. According to results of exploratory factor analysis, total 14 items collected at three factors. Factors were identified as recognition of forgiveness, internalization of forgiveness and practice of genuine forgiveness. When scale’s reliability study was made by split-half reliability method, correlation found .71 (p<.01). It can be said based on the findings that Forgiveness Flexibility Scale High School Form is a reliable and valid instrument which can be used in the fields of education and psychology.

 

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, ortaöğretim öğrencilerinde affetme esnekliğini belirleyen bir ölçek geliştirmek ve ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirliğini test etmektir. Araştırma 651 ortaöğretim öğrencisi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliğini test etmek için kullanılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda ölçeğin toplam varyansının %45.5’ini açıklayan bir yapı elde edilmiştir. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre; toplam 14 madde, üç faktörde toplanmaktadır. Faktörler affetmeyi tanıma, affetmeyi içselleştirme ve gerçek affetmeyi uygulama olarak tanımlanmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirlik çalışması testi ikiye ayırma yöntemi ile gerçekleştirildiğinde .71 (p<.01) korelasyon bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlara dayanarak Affetme Esnekliği Lise Formu Ölçeğinin eğitim ve psikoloji alanında kullanılabilecek, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Tuğba Seda Çolak, Düzce University

Assist. Prof. Dr., Düzce University, Education Faculty, Psychological Counseling and Guidance Department

Mustafa Koç, Sakarya University

Assoc. Prof. Dr., Sakarya University, Education Faculty, Psychological Counseling and Guidance Department

Halime Eker, Ministry of Education

M.A., Bayrampaşa Dr., Sakarya University, Education Faculty, Psychological Counseling and Guidance DepartmentCounseling and Research Center, İstanbul

Betül Düşünceli, Sakarya University

Dr., Sakarya University, Education Faculty, Psychological Counseling and Guidance Department

References

Anderson, J. C. ve Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions and Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.

Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C. ve Barnes-Homes, D. (2006). Psychological Flexibility, ACT, and Organizational Behaviour. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 25-54.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.

Cameron, K. ve Caza, A. (2002). Organizational and Leadership Virtues and the Role of Forgiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 33-48.

Cheung, C. (2001). Assessing Coping Flexibility in Real-Life and Laboratory Settings: A Multimethod Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 814-833.

Çolak, T. S. (2014). Logoterapi Yönelimli Grupla Psikolojik Danışmanın Affetme Esnekliği Kazandırma Üzerindeki Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.

Diblasio, F. A. ve Proctor, J. H. (1993). Therapists and the Clinical Use of Forgiveness. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 21(2), 175-184.

Enright, R. D. ve Kittle, B. A. (1999). Forgiveness in Psychology and Law: The Meeting of Moral Development and Restorative Justice. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 27(5), 1621-1631.

Enright, R. D. ve the Human Development Study Group. (1991). The Moral Development of Forgiveness. W. Kurtines ve J. Gerwirtz (Ed.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (pp. 123-152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fincham, F. D. (2000). The Kiss of the Porcupines: from Attributing Responsibility to Forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7, 1–23.

Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. ve Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in Marriage: Current Status and Future Directions. Family Relations, 55, 415–427.

Fitzgibbons, R. P. (1986). The Cognitive and Emotive Uses of Forgiveness in the Treatment of Anger. Psychotherapy, 23, 629-633.

Fitzgibbons, R., Enright, R. ve O’Brien, T. (2004). Learning to Forgive. American School Board Journal, 191, 24-26.

Hargrave, T. D. ve Sells, J. N. (1997). The Development of a Forgiveness Scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23(1), 41-62.

Harris, A. H., Luskin, F., Norman, S. B., Standard, S., Bruning, J., Evans, S. ve Thoresen, C. E. (2006). Effects of a Group Forgiveness Intervention on Forgiveness, Perceived Stress, and Trait-Anger. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(6), 715-733.

Kearns, J. N. ve Fincham, F. D. (2004). A Prototype Analysis of Forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 838-855.

Martin, M. M. ve Anderson, C. M. (1998). The Cognitive Flexibility Scale: Three Validity Studies. Communication Reports, 11(1), 1-9.

Özgün, S. (2010). The predictors of the traumatic effect of extramarital infidelity on married women: Coping strategies, resources, and forgiveness. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Orta Doğu Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Rainey, C. A., Readdick, C. A. ve Thyer, B. A. (2 012). Forgiveness-Based Group Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Studies Published from 1993-2006. Best Practices in Mental Health, 8(1), 29-51.

Sümer, N (2000). Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3, 74-79.

Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S., Heinze, L., Neufeld, J. E., Shorey, H. S., Roberts, J. C, ve Roberts, D. E. (2005). Dispositional Forgiveness of Self, Others, and Situations. Journal of Personality, 73, 313-359.

Wade, N. G., Bailey, D. C. ve Shaffer, P. (2005). Helping Clients Heal: Does Forgiveness Make a Difference?. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(6), 634–641.

Wade, N. G. ve Worthington Jr., E. L. (2005). In a Search Of a Common Core: A Content Analysis Of Interventions to Promote Forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(2), 160-177.

Waldron, V. R. ve Kelley, D. L. (2005). Forgiving communication as a response to relational transgressions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 723-742.

Worthington, E.L. (2003). Forgiving and Reconciling: Bridges to Wholeness and Hope. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.

Worthington, E. L. ve Scherer, M. (2004). Forgiveness is an Emotion-Focused Coping Strategy That can Reduce Health Risks and Promote Health Resilience: Theory, Review, and Hypotheses. Psychology and Health, 19(3), 385–405.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-24

How to Cite

Çolak, T. S., Koç, M., Eker, H., & Düşünceli, B. (2017). Forgiveness Flexibility Scale For Secondary Education: Validity and reliability study&lt;p&gt;Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinde Affetme Esnekliği Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 63–73. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3578

Issue

Section

Guidance and Psychological Counselling