Ambivalent colonal relations in octavia butler’s wild seed
Keywords:
Ambivalence, Hegemony, Postcolonialism, Self-Other Relationship, ButlerAbstract
This article explores postcolonial powers of ambivalence in Octavia Butler’s Wild Seed (1980). It will offer an in-depth analysis of the thematic and ideological characteristics of selected work. We will mainly focus on the theme of the mutual relationship between the colonized and the colonizer in the novel. This relationship is specified to the concept of ambivalence that incarnates the dual, yet, uncontrolled relationship between the colonized and the colonizer. Nevertheless, the colonized considers the colonizer as oppressive but an envious power; and the colonizer judges the colonized as inferior but indigenous. The colonial relationship will also be revealed by using the concept of self-other. Such concept scrutinizes the way the colonized and the colonizer perceive and resist each other. Thus, the study’s main focus point is the power relationship developed in the light of colonial ambivalence and self-other continuum. The colonial characteristics of this study offer a new interpretation of the colonial relationship depicted in the novel. Accordingly, the ambivalent relationship between the colonized and the colonizer will be equal (i.e. both of them have positive and negative attributes). This interpretation paves the way for other discourse studies interested in the depiction of the colonized and the colonizer relationship in postcolonial literature in general, and in Butler’s fiction in particular.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ahmad, A. (1992). In Theory: Class, Nations, Literature. London: Verso, 1992.
Appleby, R S. (2000). The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Ashcroft, B. and Pal A. (1999). Edward said: Paradox of Identity. London: Routledge.
Berman, N., Euan M., and E. Jouannet. (2011). Passion and Ambivalence: Colonialism, Nationalism, and International Law. Leiden: BRILL
Bhabha, H. K. (1990). Nation and Narration. London: Routledge. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.
Boehme, E. (2006). Empire, the National, and the Postcolonial. New York: Oxford University Press
Butler, O. E. (1980). Wild Seed. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday
Chibber, V. (2012). Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London : Verso
Hollway, W. and B. Featherstone (1997). Mothering and Ambivalence. London: Routledge,
Hoogvelt, A. (2001). Globalization and the Postcolonial World. London: Pulgrave
Kapoor, I. (2008). The Postcolonial Politics of Development. London: Routledge
Krishna, S. (2009). Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
Laitin, D. (1986). Hegemony and Culture: Politics and Religious Change Among the Yoruba. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Loomba, A. (1998). Colonialism and Postcolonialism. New York: Routledge
Moore-Gilbert, B. (1997). Postcolonial Theory: Contexts, Practices, Politics. New York: Verso.
Nandy, A. (1988). The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books
Sheffer, G. (1986). Modern Diasporas in International Politics. London and Sydney: Croom Helm
Wainwright, J. (2008). Decolonizing Development: Colonial Power and the Maya. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Williams, P. & Chrisman, L. (1994). Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial: A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press
Wisker, G. (2007). Key Concepts in Postcolonial Literature. New York: Palgrave
Young, R. (1993). White Mythologies: Writing History and the West. London: Routledge
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
