Nano innovation with smart products: The youth’s nanotech awareness, perception of benefits/risks<p>Akıllı ürünleriyle nano yeniliği: Gençlerin nanoteknoloji farkındalığı, fayda/risk algıları

Authors

  • Ebru Güzeloğlu Ege University

Keywords:

Nanotechnology, innovation, youth, perceptions, Turkey, Nanoteknoloji, yenilik, gençler, algılar, Türkiye

Abstract

Starting with 2000’s the potential of this technology managed to catch the attention of governments, private sectors, and even key civil decision makers. By creating new resources for production systems, adding new functions to products and even equipping new products with extraordinary functions, this technology has quickly entered in research labs and, soon after, in the economic and social lives of the societies. Along with all these promises and its great potential, some doubts as well have been brought to public attention, namely issues related to the impact of nanoscience development upon health and the environment; this lead to a certain display of resistance to its benefits by recalling previous unsuccessful experiments and so not being able to demonstrate its potential to the public. The research results found in the literature draw attention to the fact that the initially low public awareness in respect with nanotechnology has gradually increased, and along with a general positivity a sense of concern created by uncertainties and risk perceptions has also emerged. Studies touching upon the importance of the perception of nanotechnology innovation and the social acceptance of its products have put an emphasis on following up the variables within the dissemination process. Among the countries that have allocated funds to nanoscience is also Turkey, but an utterly limited literature is available on the topic of nanotechnology and public perception. In this respect, this study aims to analyze, by using Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Model, the variables in phenomena such as the tendencies of using nanotech products, benefit/risk perceptions, the perceived properties of innovation, and technological trend profiles. In conclusion, the results of this research, done with the participation of 446 students from science, health and social sciences departments, have put forward findings such as a high awareness and an overall positivity towards nanotechnological products, but also a certain precaution in the preferences of buying food products.

 

Özet

2000’li yılların başından itibaren potansiyeli ile nanoteknoloji hükümetler, özel sektör ve sivil aktörlerin dikkatini çekmeyi başarmıştır. Üretim sistemlerine yeni kaynaklar yaratarak, ürünlere yeni işlevler katarak ve hatta sıra dışı işlevlerle donanmış yeni ürünleri üreten bu teknoloji toplumların ekonomik ve sosyal yaşamlarına da girmiştir. Tüm bu olağanüstü vaatlerin ve güçlü potansiyelin yanında nanobilimdeki sağlık ve çevre üzerinde yeni sorunları gündeme getiren belirsizlikler, kamusal alanda önceki olumsuz deneyimleri çağrıştırma, potansiyelini ortaya koyamadan nanoteknolojiye direnç geliştirme ihtimallerini yaratmıştır. Literatürdeki araştırmaların sonuçları da, kamuda başlarda düşük olan nanoteknoloji farkındalığının giderek yükseldiğini ve genel iyimserliğin yanında risk algıları ve belirsizliğin yarattığı endişelerin oluştuğuna dikkat çekmiştir. Çalışmalar, nanoteknoloji yeniliği ve ürünlerin toplumsal kabulü açısından algıların önemine değinmiştir. Nanobilime kaynak ayıran Türkiye’de ise kamu algıları konusunda son derece kısıtlı bir literatür bulunmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada nanoteknoloji algılarının ölçülmesinde Rogers’ın Yeniliğin Yayılımı Modeli temel alınarak yeniliğin algılanan özellikleri, teknoloji yönelim profilleri, nanoteknolojik ürün kullanma eğilimleri ve fayda/risk algıları gibi değişkenler analiz edilmiştir. Fen, sağlık ve sosyal bilimler alanlarından 446 üniversite öğrencisi katılımcı ile yapılan araştırma sonuçlarında yüksek bilinirlik, genel iyimserlik ancak gıda ürün kategorilerine karşı temkinli satın alma tercihi gibi bulgulara ulaşılmıştır.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Ebru Güzeloğlu, Ege University

İletişim Fakültesi, Halkla İlişkiler ve Tanıtım Bölümü, Araştırma Görevlisi Doktor

References

Arnaldi, S. (2008). “Converging Technologies in The Italian Daily Press 2002-2006: Preliminary Results of An Ongoing Research Project”. Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research. 21(1): 87-94. DOI: 10.1080/13511610802002304.

Baird D. (2007). “Navigating Nanotechnology Through Society”. in Nanotechnology: Societal Implications II - Individual Perspectives. M.C. Roco, W. S. Bainbridge (Eds.) Springer: Dordrecht.

Balbus J., Denison R., Florini K., Walsh S. (2005). “Getting Nanotechnology Right the First Time”. Environmental Defence Fund Report: Nanotech Risks. Issues in Science and Technology. http://www.m.environmentaldefense.org/sites/default/files/4816_nanotechstatementNAS.pdf. Erişim: 30.04.2014.

Bergeson, L. (2011). “PEN Reports increase in nanoenabled consumer products”. http://nanotech.lawbc.com/2011/03/articles/united-states/pen-reports-increase-in-nanoenabled-consumer-products/. Erişim: 25.11.2011.

Boulton W.R. (2007). “Managing The Nanotechnology Revolution: Consider The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Criteria”. in Nanotechnology: Societal Implications II - Individual Perspectives. M. C. Roco, W. S. Bainbridge (Eds.) Springer: Dordrecht.

Canton, J. (2002). “The Impact of Convergent Technologies and The Future of Business and The Economy”. In Converging Technologies For Improving Human Performance - Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. (Eds). M.C. Roco, W.S. Bainbridge. National Science Foundation Report. USA: World Technology Evaluation Center (WTEC) Inc.

Chen H., Roco M.C., Li X., Lin Y. (2008) Trends in nanotechnology patents. Nature Nanotechnology. 3: 123-126. DOI:10.1038/nnano.2008.51.

Cobb M. D., Macoubrie J. (2004). “Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust”. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 6: 395-405. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4.

Cormick C. (2009). “Why do we need to know what the public thinks about nanotechnology?”. Nanoethics. 3: 167–173. DOI: 10.1007/s11569-009-0065-z.

Cambridge Nanomaterials Advisory Committee Report (2008). “Recommendations for a Municipal Health & Safety Policy for Nanomaterials”. Cambridge Public Health Department. http://www.cambridgepublichealth.org/publications/July_17_08_Nano_Recommendations.pdf. Erişim: 30.04.2014.

Fujita. Y. (2005). “Perception of nanotechnology among general public in Japan”. NRI Nanotechnology and Public Survey Project, Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly. No.4. http://www.nanoworld.jp/apnw/ articles/library4/pdf/4-6.pdf. Erişim: 10.09.2011.

Future Trends Forum (FTF) Report for Bankinter Foundation of Innovation (2006). “Nanotechnology: The Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century”. http://www.fundacionbankinter.org/en/publications/nanotechnology-the-21st-centurys-industrial-revolution. E.T. 10.09.2011

Garber C. (2006). “Nanotechnology food coming to a fridge near you”. 28.12.2006. Nanowerk. http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=1360.php. E.T.11.02.2011.

Gaskell G., Eyck T., Jackson J., Veltri G. (2005). “Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States”. Public Understanding of Science. 14(1): 81-92. DOI: 10.1177/0963662505048949.

Hargroves K., Smith, M. H. (2005). “The natural advantage of nations: business opportunities, innovation, and governance in the 21st century”. http://www.naturaledgeproject.net/NAONChapter1.4.aspx. Erişim: 29.04.2014.

Heinze T. (2004). “Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Europe: Analysis of Publications and Patent Applications including Comparisons with the United States”. Nanotechnology Law & Business. 1(4): 1-20.

Hullman A. (2006). The economic development of nanotechnology - An indicators based analysis. Avrupa Komisyonu. Nano Bilim ve Teknolojileri – Yöndeş Bilim ve Teknolojiler Unitesi Araştırma Raporu. http://cordis.europa.eu./nanotechnology. Erişim: 03.01.2011

Kamanlıoğlu E., A. Göztaş (2010). “Yöndeş Teknolojiler, Bireyler, İhtiyaçları ve Çelişkiler”. Tüketici Yazıları II. içinde (Ed. M. Babaoğul, A. Şener.) Ankara: HÜ Tüpadem Yayınları. ss.85-103.

Kelland K. (2010). “Scientists see risks and benefits in nano foods”. Reuters. 15.09.2010. http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/09/15/us-nano-food-idUSTRE68E24W20100915. Erişim: 29.04.2014.

Lloyd's Emerging Risk Team Report, 2007. “Nanotechnology: Recent Developments, Risks and Opportunities”, http://www.lloyds.com/~/media/Lloyds/Archive/Lloyds%20Market%20Gallery/Lloyds%20Market%20Gallery/ER_Nanotechnology_Report.pdf. Erişim: 27.04.2014.

MARS (Market Attitude Research Services Pty Ltd.) 2011 Report. Australian Community Attitudes Held about Nanotechnology – Trends 2005-2011. Australian Goverment Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, http://www.innovation.gov.au/INDUSTRY/NANOTECHNOLOGY/PUBLICAWARENESSANDENGAGEMENT/Pages/ResearchandReports.aspx. Erişim: 12.11.2011

McGinn E. R. (2007). “Ethical Issues in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Reflections and Suggestions”. in Nanotechnology: Societal Implications II - Individual Perspectives. M.C. Roco, W. S. Bainbridge (Eds.) Springer: Dordrecht.

Nanotechnology Business Research Report (2005). “Nanotechnology and The Business Community: A Study of Business’ Understanding of and Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology”. http://www.innovation.gov.au/INDUSTRY/NANOTECHNOLOGY/PUBLICAWARENESSANDENGAGEMENT/Pages/ResearchandReports.aspx. Erişim: 10.11.2010.

Nova Workforce Board Report. (2003). Nanotechnology: The next great wave of innovation. http://www.novaworks.org/lmi/reports/nanotech2003.pdf. Erişim: 10.11.2010.

Pathak. P. Katiyar. V. K. ve Giri. S. (2007). “Cancer Research - Nanoparticles, Nanobiosensors and Their Use in Cancer Research”. Journal of Nanotechnology Online. ss.1-16. DOI: 10.2240/azojono0116.

PEN Consumer Inventory (2014) http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/, Erişim: 30.04.2014.

Roco. M. C., Bainbridge W. S. (2002). Converging Technologies For Improving Human Performance - Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. USA: World Technology Evaluation Center (WTEC) Inc.

Roco. M.C. (2005). “International Perspective on Government Nanotechnology Funding in 2005”. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. Vol. 7(6): 707-712. DOI:10.1007/s11051-005-3141-5.

Roco, M.C. (2010). “The Long View of Nanotechnology Development: The National Nanotechnology Initiative at Ten Years”. in Nanotechnology Long-term Impacts and Research Directions: 2000-2020. USA: World Technology Evaluation Center (WTEC) Inc.

Rogers E. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press.

Satterfield T., Kandlikar, M., Beaudrie C.E,. Conti J., Harthorn, B.H. (2009) “Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies”. Nature Nanotechnology. 4(11): 752-748. DOI: 10.1038/NNANO.2009.265.

Saxby, S. (1998). “Converging Technologies Pose Challenge For Europe”. Computer Law & Security Report. (Editorial) 14(3):150. ISSN: 0267-3649.

Scheufele D. A., Lewenstein B. V. (2005). “The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies”. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 7: 659-667. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2.

Sefer. İ. (2010). “Nanoteknolojide Türkiye ve Dünya”. Politika Dergisi. http://politikadergisi.com/okur-makale/nanoteknolojide-turkiye-ve-dunya Erişim: 12.10.2011

Sheetz T., Vidal J., Pearson, T.D, Lozano K. (2005). “Nanotechnology: Awareness and societal concerns”. Technology in Society. 27: 329-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.10.

Siegrist M. Stampfli, N. Kastenholz, H., Keller, C. (2008). “Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging”. Appetite 51: 283–290. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.02.020.

Siegrist M. Stampfli, N. Kastenholz, H., (2009). “Acceptance of nanotechnology foods: a conjoint study examining consumers’ willingness to buy”. British Food Journal. 111(7): 660-668. DOI: 10.1108/00070700910972350.

Simons J., Zimmer R., Vierboom C., Härlen, I., Hertel, R. Gaby-Fleur Böl (2009). “The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology”. J Nanopart Res. 11:1555–1571. DOI:10.1007/s11051-009-9653-7.

Toth Eszter. (2009). “Buying the nano market”. HesaMag Special Report 3/30. http://www.etui.org/content/download/3231/37482/file/Buying+the+nanomarket.pdf Erişim: 30.04.2014.

Tu Y., Huang T., (2007). “A Study of Strengthening Nano-Technology New Product Value By Using Internet-Marketing Technology”, PICMET 2007 Proceedings, 5-9August, Portland, Oregon-USA.

TÜSİAD –Sabancı Üniv Rekabet Forumu Raporu. (2008). “Uluslararası Rekabet Stratejileri: Nanoteknoloji ve Türkiye”. Rapor No: T/2008-11/474. http://ref.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/ref.sabanciuniv.edu/files/nano_0.pdf. Erişim 30.4.2014.

Wood, S., Jones, R., Geldhart, A. (2003). The Social and Economic Challenges of Nanotechnology. Economic and Social Research Council. London. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/challenges_of_nanotechnology_tcm8-13557.pdf. Erişim: 30.04.2014.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-23

How to Cite

Güzeloğlu, E. (2015). Nano innovation with smart products: The youth’s nanotech awareness, perception of benefits/risks&lt;p&gt;Akıllı ürünleriyle nano yeniliği: Gençlerin nanoteknoloji farkındalığı, fayda/risk algıları. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 274–297. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/2903

Issue

Section

Applied Communication