Effective instructional design for web-based English vocabulary learning: Under the light of theories

Authors

  • Dinçer Biçer Bülent Ecevit University
  • Ömür Akdemir Bülent Ecevit University

Keywords:

Web-based Instruction, Foreign Language Learning, Vocabulary Learning, Educational Technology, Higher Education

Abstract

There has been exciting and serious progress in the field of computers for teaching English. Identification of the most effective methods is essential to make teaching and learning more efficient. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of using multiple content forms in web-based instruction on students’ English vocabulary learning. The study was conducted at the Compulsory Preparatory Program of a state university located in the Black Sea region of Turkey with 106 students. The factorial research design was used to conduct the study. Thus, the effect of using multiple content forms in web-based instruction on students’ English vocabulary learning was analyzed.

The vocabulary level of students was measured with a web-based multiple choice English vocabulary achievement test. The measure of internal consistency of the English vocabulary achievement test was 0.966. The findings of this study indicate that, in vocabulary teaching, providing definitions in an audio format in English is more effective in teaching English vocabulary than providing the same definitions in an audio format in English accompanied with pictures. Mobile devices which eliminate the time and distance limitations can be used in further studies with developmental applications to investigate the effects on students’ English vocabulary learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Dinçer Biçer, Bülent Ecevit University

Instructor

Bülent Ecevit University, School of Foreign Languages, Department of Modern Languages 

Ömür Akdemir, Bülent Ecevit University

Associate Professor

Bülent Ecevit University, Ereğli Education Faculty, Computer Education and Instructional Technology Department

References

Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Sciences, 35, 499-517.

Akdemir, Ö. (2008). Online Courses: Experiences of Instructional Technology Faculty Members. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 9, 2, 97-108.

Al-Jabri, S. S. (2009). The Effects of L1 and L2 Glosses on Reading Comprehension and Recalling Ideas by Saudi Students. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 1, 11-27.

Basoglu, E. B. & Akdemir, Ö. (2010). A Comparison of Undergraduate Students’ English Vocabulary Learning: Using Mobile Phones and Flash Cards. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 3, 1-7.

Blachowicz, C. L. Z. & Fisher P. J. L. R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.). (2000). Vocabulary instruction. Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.

Brünken, R., Plass, J.L. & Leutner D. (2004). Assessment of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning with Dual-Task Methodology: Auditory Load and Modality Effects. Instructional Science, 32, 115-132.

Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.

Chun, D. M. & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 183–198.

Creswell, John W. (2002). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, U.S.A: SAGE Publications

Hamatr, A. (2008). Web Technologies for Language Learning and Implications for the design of CMS or language instructon. Proceedins of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 29, 61-65.

Hismanoglu, S. (2010). Focus on Vocabulary. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 106-111.

Iandoli, L. J. (1990). Call and the Profession: The current state. The French Review, 64, 2, 261-272.

Karal, H. & Berigel, M. (2007). Yabancı Dil Eğitim Ortamlarının Bilisim ve İletisim Teknolojileri Kullanılarak Zenginlestirilmesi. [http://inet-tr.org.tr/inetconf11/bildiri/56.doc], Retrieved: 22.01.2011.

Ko, M. H. (2005). Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 2.

Kost, C. R., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J. L. (1999). Textual and Pictorial Glosses: Effectiveness on Incidental Vocabulary Growth When Reading - in a Foreign Language. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 1, 89-97.

Kuzu, A., Akbulut, Y. & Sahin M. C. (2007). Application of Multimedia Design Used in Course-Books: An Evaluation Tool. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6, 2, 8-14.

Ma, Q. & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer Assisted Vocabulary learning: Design and Evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1, 15-45.

Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.

Mayer, R. E. (2000). Multimedia Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The Magical Number Seven or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.

Miyasako, N. (2002). Does text-glossing have any effects on incidental vocabulary learning through reading for Japanese senior high school students? Language Education & Technology, 39, 1-20.

Paivio, A.(1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.

Paivio, A.(1990). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Paivio, A. & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture Superiority in Free Recall: Imagery or Dual Coding?. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176-206.

Plass, J. L., Chun D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221–243.

Plass, J. L., Moreno R., & Brünken, R. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sarıca, G. N. & Çavus, N. (2009). New trends in 21st Century English learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 439-445.

Simsek, A., Özdamar, N., Becit, G., Kılıçer, K., Akbulut, Y., & Yıldırım, Y. (2007). Türkiye'de Eğitim Teknolojileri Arastırmalarında Güncel Eğilimler. Presented at 1st International Computer and Instruction Technologies Symposium, Çanakkale,, Turkey.

Türkyılmaz, M. (2008). Dil ve Anlatım Dersinde Bir Ölçme Aracı Olarak Yazılı Sınavların Kullanımı Konusunda Öğretmen Görüsleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırsehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 9, 3, 1-14.

Wood, J. (2001). Can software support children’s vocabulary development? Language Learning & Technology, 5, 1, 66-201.

Yeh, Y. & Wang, C. W. (2003). Effects of Multimedia Vocabulary Annotations and Learning Styles on Vocabulary Learning. CALICO Journal, 21, 1, 131-144.

Ying Ping, Chen (2008); “Foreign language learning based on Knowledge Building Pedagogy and web-resources,” US-China Foreign Language, 6, 3, 22-32.

Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: Their Effects on Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 3, 85-101.

Zhang, C. (2009). Mental lexicon and English Vocabulary Teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 7, 3, 42-45.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-03

How to Cite

Biçer, D., & Akdemir, Ömür. (2015). Effective instructional design for web-based English vocabulary learning: Under the light of theories. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 1463–1476. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3204

Issue

Section

Computer Education and Instructional Technologies