Perceptions of school resource officers on juvenile delinquents in schools

Authors

  • Serkan Taşğın Sanliurfa Emniyet Mudurlugu
  • İsmail Cenk Demirkol Erzincan Emniyet Mudurlugu
  • Gökhan Aksu Sanliurfa Emniyet Mudurlugu

Keywords:

School Resource Officer, Discretion, Delinquency, Juvenile Justice System, School

Abstract

Violence is very common in the schools of the U.S. Therefore, families have suspicions not only about competency of the education but also for safety of their children in the school. While there is a great deal of studies which examined the effectiveness and success of school resource officers in schools, and studies which explore the perceptions of citizens, school administration, and juveniles toward police, fewer studies exploring the perceptions of school resource officers about different issues such as their perceptions toward juvenile justice system, school administration and staff, families of juveniles, and juvenile offenders. Fifteen school resource officers were interviewed in schools in a mid-sized Midwestern city in the U.S.. The researcher was allowed to conduct interview with police officers by Police Department’s approval. The consent forms were delivered to participants which were reviewed and signed by the participants. Purposive sampling method was used by asking Deputy Chief in police department either who has worked or currently working in schools school resource officers. The interviews were digitally recorded. The researcher saved these interviews to the computer and transcribed them into the word processor. Findings revealed that there was no standardized training for school resource officers. Their criterion for using discretion was mostly based on the attitude of the families toward them or toward their children. They perceived minor offenses in schools as ‘gateway’ for future serious offenses. Since the study participants were not randomly selected and the sample size was 15, findings cannot be generalized to all school resource officers in the U.S. However, it is expected that all school resource officers would have common experiences such as use of discretion, problems with school administration, and the prevalence of violence among youth. Thus, this study can provide some insights about the experiences of school resource officers from other States of the U.S. Further research in the area of school resource officers is needed to determine solutions to youth violence in schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Serkan Taşğın, Sanliurfa Emniyet Mudurlugu

Graduated from Security Sciences Institute in Ankara in 1999. He earned master’s degree at University of Louisville (Justice Administration) in 2008 and he started doctoral study in the same year at Michigan State University (School of Criminal Justice) which ended in 2012. He is currently working as police major in one of the Southeastern provinces (Sanliurfa) in Turkey. His research interests are juvenile delinquency, domestic violence, child abuse and terrorism.

İsmail Cenk Demirkol, Erzincan Emniyet Mudurlugu

Ph.D., Security Science Specialist,

Gökhan Aksu, Sanliurfa Emniyet Mudurlugu

Ph.D., Security Science Specialist,

References

Barber, N. (2004). Single parenthood as a predictor of cross-national variation in violent crime. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 343-358.

Biemer, P. P., Lyberg, L.E. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Brownfield, D., Thompson, K. (2008). Correlates of delinquent identity: Testing interactionist, labeling, and control theory. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 3(1), 44-53.

Clark, R.L. (2007). Public and professionals’ views of the juvenile justice system in Georgia: A report on a general population poll and a web survey of professionals in the juvenile justice field. Retrieved November 22, 2009, from http://www.cviog.uga.edu/childfamilypolicy/publications/juvenilejusticeviews.pdf

Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.

Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crouch, E., and Williams, D. (1995). What cities are doing to protect kids. Educational Leadership 52, 60–63.

Dinkes, R., Kemp, J., Baum, K., Snyder, T.D. (2009). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2008. Retrieved November 25, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009022.pdf

Dorn, R.A.V. (2004). Correlates of violent and nonviolent victimization in a sample of public high school students. Violence and Victims, 19(3), 303-320.

Fisher, C.J., Mawby, R.I. (1982). Juvenile delinquency and police discretion in an inner-city area. British Journal of Criminology, 22(1), 63-75.

Furlong, M., Babinski, L.,Poland, S., Munoz, J., Boles, S. (1996). Factors associated with school psychologists’ perceptions of campus violence. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 28-37.

Johnson, L.M., Simons, R.L., Conger, R.D. (2004). Criminal justice system involvement and continuity of youth crime: A longitudinal analysis, Youth & Society, 36(1), 3-29.

Johnson, I. M. (1999) “School violence: the effectiveness of a school resource officer program in a southern city”, Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(2), 173-192.

I-SAFE (2009). Cyber Bullying: Statistics and tips. Retrieved November 25, 2009 from http://www.isafe.org/channels/sub.php?ch=op&sub_id=media_cyber_bullying

Klein, M.W. (1986). Labeling theory and delinquency policy: An experimental test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13(1), 47-79.

Kraus, J., Hasleton, S.L. (1982). Juvenile offensers’ diversion potential as a function of police perceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology 10(2), 171-182.

Lambert, R. D. and McGinty, D. (2002) “Law enforcement officers in schools: setting priorities”, Journal of Educational Administration, 40(3), 257-273.

Landau, S.F. (1981). Juveniles and the police. British Journal of Criminology, 21(1), 27-46.

Larson, J., Busse, R.T. (1998). Specialist-level preparation in school violence and youth gang intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 35(4), 373-379.

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individuals in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Lotz, R. (2005). Youth crime: A modern synthesis in America. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

May, D.C., Cordner, G., Fessel, S.D. (2004). School resource officers as community police officers: Fact or fiction. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 4(6), 173-187.

Mears, D. P. (2001). Get though with juvenile offenders: Explaining support for sanctioning youths as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(2), 206-226.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

NCES, (2013). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2013. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/crimeindicators/crimeindicators2013/ind_16.asp on February 10, 2015.

Piliavin, I., Briar, S. (1964). Police encounters with juveniles. The American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 206-214.

Ryan, L.G., Loessi, K.M., Nieri, T. (2007). Relationships with adults as predictors of substance use, gang involvement, and threats to safety among disadvantaged urban high-school adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(8), 1053-1071.

Sampson, R.J., Laub, J.H. (2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. Annals of the American Academy of political and Social Science, 602, 12-45.

Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Simons, R.L., Simons, L.G., Wallace, L.E. (2004). Families, delinquency, and crime: Linking society’s most basic institution to antisocial behavior. Los Angeles: Roxbury.

Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data, (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Singleton, R.A., Straits, B.C. (2005). Approaches to social research. (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Snyder, H. N. (2005). Juvenile arrests 2003. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, D.C: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

SRO (2009). SRO Survey, Retrieved November 22, 2009, from http://nasro.org/presentations/2009_SRO_Survey.swf

Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the community. Boston: Ginn.

Trojanowicz, R.C., Morash, M., Schram, P.J. (2001). Juvenile delinquency: Concepts and control. (6th ed.), NJ: Prentice Hall.

United States Department of Justice. (1999) A national assessment of school resource officer programs .Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

United States Department of Justice. (2001). COPS: On the beat. Washington; DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. School Safety Leadership Initiative.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-11

How to Cite

Taşğın, S., Demirkol, İsmail C., & Aksu, G. (2015). Perceptions of school resource officers on juvenile delinquents in schools. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 664–684. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3062

Issue

Section

Criminology