“Professional, approachable, and fair” – Students’ perceptions of the vocational education teacher’s authority

Authors

  • Anne Koski-Heikkinen Kainuu Vocational College
  • Kaarina Määttä University of Lapland
  • Satu Uusiautti University of Lapland, Finland

Keywords:

vocational education, vocational education teacher, vocational education student, professional identity, teacherhood, teacher authority, method of empathy-based stories

Abstract

How do students perceive vocational education teachers and their authority? The purpose of this study was to describe the vocational education teacher’s authority and the basis of authority relationship. Finnish vocational education students (N = 65) were recruited in this study. They were asked to write about vocational education teachers through a method of empathy-based stories. The students depicted the authority relationship by describing a good or unsuccessful teacher’s actions in vocational teaching situations. The data were analyzed with qualitative content analysis method. In the students’ writings, the teacher authority were viewed from four dimensions that were pedagogical skills, professional expertise, social skills, and personal characteristics. Based on the results, a typology of vocational education teacher’s authority was created and presented in this article. The typology can be used in teacher training and as a tool for vocational education teachers to contemplate on their position and to develop a functional authority relationship with vocational education students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Anne Koski-Heikkinen, Kainuu Vocational College

PhD, Head of vocational education and Study advisor, Kainuu Vocational College, Kajaani, Finland

Kaarina Määttä, University of Lapland

PhD, Professor, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland

Satu Uusiautti, University of Lapland, Finland

PhD, Researcher, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland

References

Arquero, J. L., and E. Romero-Frías. 2013. “Using social network sites in higher education: An experience in business studies.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 50 (3): 238-249. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.760772

Barabasch, A., and B. Watt-Malcolm. 2012. “Teacher preparation for vocational education and training in Germany: a potential model for Canada?” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 42 (1): 1-29.

Billett, S. 2008. “Learning through work: Exploring instances of relational interdependencies.” International Journal of Educational Research 47 (4): 232–240.

Bin Mahfooz, S., and K. Hovde. 2010. “Successful education reform: lessons from Poland.” ECA Knowledge Brief 34 (11).

https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/10147/622500BRI0Succ0Box0361475B00PUBLIC0.pdf?sequence=1.

Burbules, V. C. 1995. “Authority and the tragic dimension of teaching.” In The educational conversation. Closing the gap, edited by J. W. Garrison and A. G. Rud Jr., 29-40. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Cantell, H. 2013. “Opettaja tarvitsee herkkyyttä ja kykyä kohdata moninaisuutta [Teachers need sensitivity and ability to encounter diversity].” Kasvatus 44 (3): 320–322.

Cedefop. 2009. Modernising vocational education and training – background report, Vol. 3. Fourth research report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/3050_3_en.pdf

Clegg, S. 1994. “Weber and Foucault: social theory for the study of organizations.” Organization Articles 1 (1): 149-178.

Crawford, T. 2008. “Winning the epistemological struggle: constructing a cultural model of shared authority in an elementary classroom.” Teachers College Record 110 (8): 1706-1736.

Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Cruce, T., G. C. Wolniak, T. A. Seifert, and E. T. Pascarella. 2006. “Impacts of good practices on cognitive development, learning orientations, and graduate degree plans during the first year of college.” Journal of College Student Development 47 (4): 365–383. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0042

Dewey, J. 1998. Experience and education - the 60th anniversary edition. West Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.

Dewey, J. 2005/1916. Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Cosimo.

Dill, S. 2007. “Durkheim and Dewey and the challenge of contemporary moral education.” Journal of Moral Education 36 (2): 221–237.

Durkheim, E. 1956. Education and society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Enlund, E., M. Luokkanen, and T. Feldt. 2013. “Opettajien eettinen kuormittuneisuus ja eettisten dilemmojen sisällöt [Teachers’ ethical burden and contents of ethical dilemmas].” Psykologia 48 (3): 176–193.

Eskola, J. 1997. Eläytymismenetelmäopas [Manual for the method of empathizing stories]. Tampere: TAJU.

Eskola, J., and J. Suoranta. 2008. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen [Introduction to qualitative research] (8th ed.) Tampere: Vastapaino.

Faraday, S., C. Overton, and S. Cooper (Eds.) 2011. Effective teaching and learning in vocational education. London: LSN: http://www.skillsdevelopment.org/pdf/Effective_teaching_and_learning_in_VE_report.pdf

Farnsworth, V., and J. Higham. 2012. “Teachers who teach their practice: the modulation of hybridised professional teacher identities in work-related educational programmes in Canada.” Journal of Education and Work 25 (4): 473–505.

Foucault, M. 1980. Power-knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. London: Harvester Press.

Gjerstad, E. 2009. Valta kotikasvatuksessa [Power in home upbringing]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

Graue, E. 2005. “De-centering the kindergarten prototype in the child-centered classroom.” In Practical transformations and transformative practices: globalization, post-modernism, and early childhood education, edited by S. Greshaber and S. Ryan, 39-58. Oxford: Elsevier.

Grollmann, P. 2008. “The quality of vocational teachers: Teacher education, institutional roles and professional reality.” European Educational Research Journal 7 (4): 535-547.

Hagera, P. 2005. “The competence affair, or why vocational education and training urgently needs a new understanding of learning.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 56 (3): 409–433.

Heikkinen, A. 1997. “Education or training? Changes in vocational teachers’ conceptions of their work.” Cambridge Journal of Education 27 (3): 405–423.

Helakorpi, S. 2010. Ammatillisen opettajakorkeakoulun opinto-opas 2010–2011 [Study of vocational teacher training college 2010-2011]. Hämeenlinna: Häme University of Applied Sciences.

Hoeckel, K., and R. Schwartz. 2010. Learning for jobs. OECD reviews of vocational education and training Germany. http://www.oecd.org/education/highereducationandadultlearning/45668296.pdf

Juntunen, A., and J. Saarti. 2000. “Library as the student's cornerstone or obstacle: Evaluating the method of empathy-based stories.” Libri 50 (4): 235-240.

Kincheloe, J. L. 2008. “Critical pedagogy in the twenty-first century. Evolution for survival.” In Critical pedagogy, edited by P. McLaren and J. L. Kincheloe, 9-42. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Koskela, H. 2003. Opiskelijoiden haasteellisuudesta ammattiopintoihin sitoutumisen substanssiteoriaan. Grounded theory –menetelmän soveltaminen ammattioppilaitoksen opettajien kuvauksiin opetettavistaan [From challenging students into a substance theory of engaging to vocational studies. Application of grounded theory in vocational education teachers’ descriptions of their students]. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.

Koski-Heikkinen, A. 2014. Ammatillisen opettajan identiteetti ja auktoriteetti. Ammatilliset opettajat ja opiskelijat ideaalia ammatillista opettajuutta etsimässä [The vocational education teacher’s identity and authority. Vocational education teachers and students searching for ideal teacherhood in vocational education]. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press.

Kostera, B., and J. J. Dengerink. 2008. “Professional standards for teacher educators: how to deal with complexity, ownership and function. Experiences from the Netherlands.” European Journal of Teacher Education 31 (2): 135-149.

Lahelma, E., and T. Gordon. 1997. “First day in secondary school: Learning to be a “professional pupil”.” Education Research and Evaluation 3 (2): 119-139.

LeBlanc, G., and D. Bearison. 2004. “Teaching and learning as bi-directional activity: Investigating dyadic interactions between child teachers and child learner.” Cognitive Development 19 (4): 499–515.

Lehtomäki, E., H. Janhonen-Abruquah, M. T. Tuomi, M.-A. Okkolin, H. Posti-Ahokas, and P. Palojoki. 2013. “Research to engage voices on the ground in educational development.” International Journal of Educational Development 35 (1): 37-43.

Lincoln, Y., S. Lynham, and E. Guba. 2011. “Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited.” In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 97-128. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lucas, B., E. Spencer, and G. Claxton. 2012. How to teach vocational education: A theory of vocational pedagogy. London: City & Guilds Group.

http://www.skillsdevelopment.org/PDF/How-to-teach-vocational-education.pdf

Maaranen, K. 2009. Widening perspectives of teacher education. Studies on theory-practice relationship, reflection, research and professional development. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

McLaughlin, T. H. 1999. “Beyond the reflective teacher.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 31 (1): 9-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.1999.tb00371.x

Määttä, K., and S. Uusiautti. 2011. “Pedagogical love and good teacherhood.” In Education 17 (2). http://ineducation.ca/article/pedagogical-love-and-good-teacherhood

Määttä, K., and S. Uusiautti. 2012. “Pedagogical authority and pedagogical love—connected or incompatible?” International Journal of Whole Schooling 8 (1): 21-39.

Niemi, H., and J. Multisilta (Eds.) 2014. Rajaton luokkahuone [Limitless classroom]. Jyväskylä: PS-Kustannus.

Nordman-Byskata, C., and A. Sacklen. 2008. Pohjoismainen vertailu työpaikalla tapahtuvasta oppimisesta ja ammattiosaamisen näyttöön perustuvasta opiskelijan arvioinnista [Nordic comparison of workplace learning and students’ professional expertise evaluation based on practical proof]. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.

Oyler, C. 1996. Making room for students: Sharing teacher authority in room 104. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Pace, J. L., and A. Hemmings. 2006. “Understanding classroom authority as a social construction”. In Classroom authority: Theory, research, and practice, edited by J. L. Pace and A. Hemmings, 1-31. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Pace, J. L., and A. Hemmings. 2007. “Understanding authority in classrooms: A review of theory, ideology, and research.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 4–27.

Pellegrino, A. M. 2009. “Pre-service teachers and classroom authority.” American Secondary Education 38 (3): 62-78.

Peters, R. 1973. Authority, responsibility, and education. London: Allen and Unwin.

Raelin, J. A. 2006. “Taking the charisma out: teaching as facilitation.” Organization Management Journal 3 (1): 4-12.

Sanders, J., and R. Mumford. 2005. “Activity and reflection: research and change with diverse groups of young people.” Qualitative Social Work 4 (2): 197-209.

Sarivaara, R., K. Määttä, and S. Uusiautti. 2014. “Audiovisual frame story as a method of critical consciousness sharing in Indigenous research.” International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, in press.

Simpson, D., and D. Beckett. 2013. “Expertise, pedagogy and practice.” Educational Philosophy and Theory iFirst 27 March 2013. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2013.779470

Spilt, J. L., and H. M. Y. Koomen. 2009. “Widening the view on teacher-child relationships: Teachers’ narratives concerning disruptive versus nondisruptive children.” School Psychology Review 38 (1): 86-101.

Tzuo, P.-W., and D.-T. Chen. 2011. “Re-conceptualizing teacher authority: When to exact.” New Horizons in Education 59 (1): 1-11.

Uusiautti, S., and K. Määttä. 2013. “Enhancing university students’ study success through caring leadership.” The European Scientific Journal SE2/2013. http://www.eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/1352

VanderStaay, S. L., B. A. Faxon, J. E. Meischen, K. T. Kolesnikov, and A. D. Ruppel. 2009. “Close to the heart: Teacher authority in a classroom community.” The National Council of Teachers of English 2 (61): 262–282.

van Manen, M. 1991. The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Vähäsantanen, K. 2013. Vocational teachers’ professional agency in the stream of change. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House.

Vähäsantanen, K., and A. Eteläpelto. 2011. “Vocational teachers’ pathways in the course of a curriculum reform.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 43 (3): 291–312.

Waller, W. 1932/1961. The sociology of teaching. New York, NY: John Wiley.

Woolley, A. W., C. F. Chabris, A. Pentland, N. Hashmi, and T. W. Malone. 2010. “Evidence for a collective Intelligence factor in the performance of human groups.” Science Magazine 330 (6004): 686–688.

Yariv, E. 2009. “Students’ attitudes on the boundaries of teachers’ authority.” School Psychology International 30 (1): 92-111.

Young, M. 2000. “Improving vocational education. Trans-European comparisons of developments in the late 1990s.” In Strategies for reforming initial vocational education and training in Europe, edited by M.-L. Stenström and J. Lasonen, 147-162. Jyväskylä: Institute of Educational Research.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-15

How to Cite

Koski-Heikkinen, A., Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2014). “Professional, approachable, and fair” – Students’ perceptions of the vocational education teacher’s authority. Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 446–463. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/2927

Issue

Section

Education